HBB vs. QLTA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) and iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA).

QLTA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Aaa - A Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2012.

Performance

HBB vs. QLTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) and iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HBB vs. QLTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HBB Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company	13.91%	0.52%	-1.60%	46.40%	-10.86%	-16.17%	-6.01%	-17.00%	-7.40%	-14.76%
QLTA iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF	-0.21%	7.36%	1.23%	7.60%	-15.14%	-2.32%	9.62%	12.54%	-2.27%	1.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBB achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than QLTA's -0.21% return.

HBB

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: 13.91%
• 6M: 30.93%
• 1Y: -3.54%
• 3Y*: 25.56%
• 5Y*: 3.46%
• 10Y*: —

QLTA

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.38%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: 2.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HBB vs. QLTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBB

HBB Risk / Return Rank: 38
HBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
HBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
HBB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
HBB Martin Ratio Rank: 39

QLTA

QLTA Risk / Return Rank: 45
QLTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QLTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QLTA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
QLTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QLTA Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBB vs. QLTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) and iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBB	QLTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	0.82	-0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.16	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.15	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	1.67	-1.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	4.92	-4.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBB vs. QLTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBB Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the QLTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBB and QLTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBB	QLTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	0.82	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.04	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.40	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between HBB and QLTA is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HBB vs. QLTA - Dividend Comparison

HBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than QLTA's 4.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HBB Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company	2.58%	2.89%	2.70%	2.49%	3.35%	2.75%	2.11%	1.86%	1.45%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%
QLTA iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF	4.43%	4.33%	4.11%	3.39%	2.79%	1.96%	2.31%	2.99%	3.09%	2.67%	2.59%	2.99%

Drawdowns

HBB vs. QLTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBB drawdown since its inception was -81.89%, which is greater than QLTA's maximum drawdown of -22.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBB and QLTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBB	QLTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.89%	-22.27%	-59.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.70%	-2.81%	-31.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.68%	-21.36%	-41.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.48%	-3.91%	-38.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.88%	-4.69%	-46.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.00%	0.95%	+18.05%

Volatility

HBB vs. QLTA - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) has a higher volatility of 20.29% compared to iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) at 2.21%. This indicates that HBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBB	QLTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.29%	2.21%	+18.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.70%	3.04%	+32.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.15%	5.33%	+57.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.86%	7.22%	+46.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.16%	7.02%	+51.14%