PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HASI vs. ITT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HASI vs. ITT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and ITT Inc. (ITT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HASI achieves a 26.28% return, which is significantly higher than ITT's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, HASI has underperformed ITT with an annualized return of 12.35%, while ITT has yielded a comparatively higher 21.05% annualized return.


HASI

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
26.28%
6M
20.95%
1Y
61.54%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
-1.43%
10Y*
12.35%

ITT

1D
1.23%
1M
2.37%
YTD
15.29%
6M
12.81%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
33.00%
5Y*
18.75%
10Y*
21.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HASI vs. ITT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HASI
Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
26.28%23.95%3.02%1.49%-43.05%-14.08%105.59%77.07%-15.37%34.31%
ITT
ITT Inc.
15.29%22.52%20.86%48.91%-19.50%33.95%5.47%54.60%-8.66%40.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HASI and ITT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HASI:

$5.01B

ITT:

$17.49B

EPS

HASI:

$0.42

ITT:

$5.58

PE Ratio

HASI:

93.11

ITT:

35.72

PEG Ratio

HASI:

2.59

ITT:

2.51

PS Ratio

HASI:

7.34

ITT:

3.86

PB Ratio

HASI:

1.97

ITT:

3.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

HASI:

$710.03M

ITT:

$4.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HASI:

$522.93M

ITT:

$1.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

HASI:

$347.85M

ITT:

$793.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HASI vs. ITT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HASI
HASI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HASI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HASI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HASI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HASI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HASI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ITT
ITT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HASI vs. ITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and ITT Inc. (ITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HASIITTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

1.99

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

4.93

+5.90

HASI vs. ITT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HASI Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the ITT Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HASI and ITT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HASI vs. ITT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HASI drawdown since its inception was -76.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ITT drawdown of -74.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HASI and ITT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HASIITTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.94%

-74.46%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.02%

-16.73%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.00%

-29.09%

-20.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.24%

-37.97%

-37.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.94%

-49.52%

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.57%

-9.95%

-17.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.76%

-18.95%

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

6.74%

-1.04%

Volatility

HASI vs. ITT - Volatility Comparison

Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and ITT Inc. (ITT) have volatilities of 8.95% and 9.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HASIITTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

9.11%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.86%

22.53%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.68%

30.38%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.20%

29.20%

+18.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.28%

31.95%

+10.33%

Dividends

HASI vs. ITT - Dividend Comparison

HASI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than ITT's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HASI
Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
4.29%5.35%6.19%5.73%5.18%2.64%2.14%4.16%6.93%5.49%6.48%5.71%
ITT
ITT Inc.
0.74%0.81%0.89%0.97%1.30%0.86%0.88%0.80%1.11%0.96%1.29%1.30%

Financials

HASI vs. ITT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. and ITT Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
124.23M
1.21B
(HASI) Total Revenue
(ITT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HASI vs. ITT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. and ITT Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
71.4%
35.4%
Portfolio components
HASI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 88.72M and revenue of 124.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

ITT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a gross profit of 428.80M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.4%.

HASI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 78.56M and revenue of 124.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.2%.

ITT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported an operating income of 141.20M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

HASI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. reported a net income of -71.97M and revenue of 124.23M, resulting in a net margin of -57.9%.

ITT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a net income of 78.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HASI and ITT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITT has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to HASI (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HASI dropped -76.94% vs ITT's -74.46%.

HASI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HASI and ITT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer