PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HALO vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HALO vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HALO achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's -4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HALO has outperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 21.28%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively lower 17.47% annualized return.


HALO

1D
-2.73%
1M
3.63%
YTD
-1.52%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
25.45%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
21.28%

ABBV

1D
1.16%
1M
4.26%
YTD
-4.18%
6M
-2.42%
1Y
18.95%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
18.28%
10Y*
17.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HALO vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
-1.52%40.77%29.36%-35.04%41.51%-5.85%140.89%21.19%-27.79%105.06%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
-4.18%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HALO and ABBV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HALO:

$8.14B

ABBV:

$382.12B

EPS

HALO:

$2.87

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

HALO:

23.13

ABBV:

104.95

PS Ratio

HALO:

5.35

ABBV:

6.08

PB Ratio

HALO:

37.08

ABBV:

13.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

HALO:

$1.51B

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HALO:

$1.23B

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

HALO:

$980.05M

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HALO vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HALO
HALO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HALO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HALO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HALO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HALO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HALO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HALO vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HALOABBVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.79

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

1.25

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.16

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.13

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.45

2.54

-1.09

HALO vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HALO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HALO and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HALOABBVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.79

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.80

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.68

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.73

-0.50

Drawdowns

HALO vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HALO drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HALO and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HALOABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.26%

-45.09%

-29.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.13%

-17.32%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.92%

-20.74%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.06%

-21.92%

-27.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.06%

-45.09%

-3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.40%

-9.77%

-8.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.91%

-10.73%

-21.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.56%

7.67%

+4.89%

Volatility

HALO vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) has a higher volatility of 10.41% compared to AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) at 5.42%. This indicates that HALO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HALOABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.41%

5.42%

+4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.18%

17.63%

+6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.89%

23.95%

+5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.47%

22.84%

+16.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.89%

25.74%

+17.15%

Dividends

HALO vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

HALO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.13%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HALO vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
376.71M
15.00B
(HALO) Total Revenue
(ABBV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HALO vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
83.5%
Portfolio components
HALO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 297.47M and revenue of 376.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

HALO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. reported an operating income of 184.52M and revenue of 376.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

HALO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. reported a net income of 150.05M and revenue of 376.71M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HALO and ABBV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HALO has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to ABBV (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HALO dropped -74.26% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HALO and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer