HAL vs. ET

In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a -14.44% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 38.09% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -3.23%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 2.23% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than ET's 7.26% yield.

The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Halliburton Company (HAL) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.39%. This indicates that HAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.