HAL vs. ET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

HAL vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HAL vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAL Halliburton Company	38.64%	7.02%	-23.19%	-6.47%	74.45%	21.99%	-21.23%	-4.90%	-44.63%	-8.18%
ET Energy Transfer LP	19.24%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-17.74%	-4.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HAL : $32.75B ET : $70.45B
EPS HAL : $1.51 ET : $1.37
PE Ratio HAL : 25.85 ET : 14.10
PS Ratio HAL : 1.50 ET : 0.84
PB Ratio HAL : 3.12 ET : 1.44
Total Revenue (TTM) HAL : $22.18B ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) HAL : $3.50B ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) HAL : $3.04B ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 38.64% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.24% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 3.03%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.51% annualized return.

HAL

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 8.83%
• YTD: 38.64%
• 6M: 60.28%
• 1Y: 57.90%
• 3Y*: 9.69%
• 5Y*: 14.31%
• 10Y*: 3.03%

ET

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 29.51%
• 10Y*: 20.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HAL vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAL

HAL Risk / Return Rank: 79
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 57
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAL vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAL	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.51	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	0.86	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.12	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	0.65	+1.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	1.82	+3.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAL vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAL	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	0.51	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	1.17	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.56	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.36	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between HAL and ET is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HAL vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than ET's 6.87% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAL Halliburton Company	1.74%	2.41%	2.50%	1.77%	1.22%	0.79%	1.67%	2.94%	2.71%	1.47%	1.33%	2.12%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.87%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

HAL vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAL	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.99%	-87.81%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.06%	-17.33%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.01%	-25.82%	-28.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.45%	-72.82%	-18.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.20%	-1.88%	-32.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.15%	-25.95%	-13.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.98%	6.24%	+5.74%

Volatility

HAL vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Halliburton Company (HAL) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.96%. This indicates that HAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAL	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.26%	4.96%	+5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.13%	11.68%	+14.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.35%	23.80%	+20.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.38%	25.48%	+14.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.95%	36.63%	+9.32%

Financials

HAL vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Halliburton Company and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 937.00M and revenue of 5.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

HAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 746.00M and revenue of 5.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

HAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 589.00M and revenue of 5.66B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.