HAL vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAL or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and ET is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HAL vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
HAL:
-1.12
ET:
0.78
HAL:
-1.61
ET:
1.23
HAL:
0.79
ET:
1.17
HAL:
-0.63
ET:
0.89
HAL:
-1.65
ET:
2.84
HAL:
25.98%
ET:
7.73%
HAL:
39.21%
ET:
27.60%
HAL:
-92.99%
ET:
-87.81%
HAL:
-65.71%
ET:
-11.56%
Fundamentals
HAL:
$18.27B
ET:
$61.60B
HAL:
$2.39
ET:
$1.32
HAL:
8.89
ET:
13.60
HAL:
11.83
ET:
0.80
HAL:
0.81
ET:
0.75
HAL:
1.76
ET:
1.74
HAL:
$22.56B
ET:
$82.06B
HAL:
$4.10B
ET:
$15.84B
HAL:
$4.32B
ET:
$15.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a -22.70% return, which is significantly lower than ET's -4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -5.86%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 1.76% annualized return.
HAL
-22.70%
-7.37%
-30.60%
-43.64%
-15.58%
13.53%
-5.86%
ET
-4.83%
6.23%
6.05%
21.42%
27.81%
27.30%
1.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAL vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HAL
ET
HAL vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
HAL vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than ET's 7.20% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 3.26% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% | 1.60% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.20% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
HAL vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
HAL vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET) have volatilities of 11.91% and 11.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
HAL vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HAL vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 879.00M and revenue of 5.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.2%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 431.00M and revenue of 5.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 204.00M and revenue of 5.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.