HAL vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAL or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and ET is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HAL vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HAL:
-1.03
ET:
2.54
HAL:
-1.41
ET:
3.58
HAL:
0.83
ET:
1.45
HAL:
-0.49
ET:
2.14
HAL:
-1.51
ET:
19.73
HAL:
18.90%
ET:
2.17%
HAL:
27.61%
ET:
16.86%
HAL:
-92.99%
ET:
-87.81%
HAL:
-57.95%
ET:
-8.01%
Fundamentals
HAL:
$23.89B
ET:
$63.82B
HAL:
$2.86
ET:
$1.36
HAL:
9.51
ET:
13.71
HAL:
1.57
ET:
0.66
HAL:
$23.07B
ET:
$83.66B
HAL:
$4.41B
ET:
$12.71B
HAL:
$4.80B
ET:
$14.83B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a -27.20% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 43.51% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -2.47%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 3.91% annualized return.
HAL
-27.20%
-15.43%
-21.82%
-27.82%
2.67%
-2.47%
ET
43.51%
1.73%
20.95%
44.35%
17.23%
3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAL vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HAL vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than ET's 6.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 2.64% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% | 1.60% | 1.03% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.98% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
HAL vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HAL vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Halliburton Company (HAL) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 7.57%. This indicates that HAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HAL vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities