HAIN vs. STZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ).

Performance

HAIN vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HAIN vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAIN The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.	-34.79%	-82.60%	-43.84%	-32.32%	-62.03%	6.13%	54.69%	63.65%	-62.59%	8.61%
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc.	9.43%	-35.99%	-7.11%	5.83%	-6.43%	16.12%	17.41%	19.85%	-28.73%	50.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HAIN : $63.26M STZ : $26.19B
EPS HAIN : -$6.05 STZ : $6.30
PS Ratio HAIN : 0.04 STZ : 2.82
PB Ratio HAIN : 0.19 STZ : 3.27
Total Revenue (TTM) HAIN : $1.51B STZ : $9.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) HAIN : $301.51M STZ : $4.88B
EBITDA (TTM) HAIN : -$428.18M STZ : $2.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAIN achieves a -34.79% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's 9.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HAIN has underperformed STZ with an annualized return of -33.60%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively higher 1.35% annualized return.

HAIN

• 1D: 10.36%
• 1M: -12.71%
• YTD: -34.79%
• 6M: -55.84%
• 1Y: -83.19%
• 3Y*: -65.61%
• 5Y*: -56.40%
• 10Y*: -33.60%

STZ

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -4.98%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 6M: 12.99%
• 1Y: -16.14%
• 3Y*: -11.04%
• 5Y*: -6.58%
• 10Y*: 1.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HAIN vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAIN

HAIN Risk / Return Rank: 7
HAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
HAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4
HAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
HAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 16

STZ

STZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
STZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
STZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
STZ Omega Ratio Rank: 18
STZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
STZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAIN vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAIN	STZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	-0.57	-0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.72	-0.66	-1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.92	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	-0.48	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	-0.78	-0.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAIN vs. STZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAIN and STZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAIN	STZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	-0.57	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.96	-0.28	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.68	0.05	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.46	-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between HAIN and STZ is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HAIN vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

HAIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAIN The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc.	2.72%	2.95%	1.77%	1.44%	1.36%	1.21%	1.37%	1.58%	1.70%	0.86%	0.98%	0.65%

Drawdowns

HAIN vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAIN drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIN and STZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAIN	STZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.17%	-67.39%	-31.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.06%	-33.85%	-52.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.79%	-51.28%	-47.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.95%	-53.53%	-45.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.01%	-42.38%	-56.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.76%	-16.45%	-24.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	64.61%	20.79%	+43.82%

Volatility

HAIN vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) has a higher volatility of 30.26% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 5.69%. This indicates that HAIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAIN	STZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.26%	5.69%	+24.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.06%	20.40%	+36.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.51%	28.66%	+63.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.21%	23.86%	+35.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.18%	26.69%	+22.49%

Financials

HAIN vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HAIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 74.44M and revenue of 384.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.

HAIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -98.82M and revenue of 384.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -25.7%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 692.00M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.1%.

HAIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported a net income of -116.01M and revenue of 384.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.2%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 502.80M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in a net margin of 22.6%.