HACAX vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
HACAX is managed by Harbor Funds. It was launched on Dec 29, 1987. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HACAX or OMFL.
Key characteristics
| HACAX | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.69% | 8.73% |
| 1Y Return | 37.59% | 22.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.67% | 4.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.80% | 13.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.19 | 1.54 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.89 | 2.13 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.34 | 1.66 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.51 | 4.90 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.86% | 4.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.54% | 14.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.72% | -33.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.46% | -0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACAX and OMFL is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HACAX vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HACAX achieves a 29.69% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's 8.73% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HACAX vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HACAX vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HACAX vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
HACAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.24% | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.08% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HACAX vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACAX drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACAX and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HACAX vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 3.75%. This indicates that HACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.