PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


H4ZJ.DEIWDA.L
YTD Return24.88%20.26%
1Y Return31.48%28.88%
3Y Return (Ann)9.67%7.14%
5Y Return (Ann)13.34%12.39%
10Y Return (Ann)12.10%10.15%
Sharpe Ratio2.832.54
Sortino Ratio3.783.55
Omega Ratio1.591.46
Calmar Ratio3.583.76
Martin Ratio16.6416.32
Ulcer Index1.88%1.74%
Daily Std Dev10.99%11.33%
Max Drawdown-33.60%-34.11%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.75%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between H4ZJ.DE and IWDA.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, H4ZJ.DE achieves a 24.88% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 20.26% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZJ.DE has outperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 12.10%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.44%
9.45%
H4ZJ.DE
IWDA.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Expense ratio chart for IWDA.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for H4ZJ.DE: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZJ.DE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for H4ZJ.DE, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for H4ZJ.DE, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for H4ZJ.DE, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for H4ZJ.DE, currently valued at 3.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for H4ZJ.DE, currently valued at 14.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0014.50
IWDA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IWDA.L, currently valued at 15.81, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.81

H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZJ.DE and IWDA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.45
2.48
H4ZJ.DE
IWDA.L

Dividends

H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

H4ZJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
0.67%1.73%1.88%1.49%1.73%2.13%2.56%2.16%2.11%2.09%2.25%0.50%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, roughly equal to the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZJ.DE and IWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.84%
-0.75%
H4ZJ.DE
IWDA.L

Volatility

H4ZJ.DE vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) is 3.03%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that H4ZJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.03%
3.26%
H4ZJ.DE
IWDA.L