PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H vs. IHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

H vs. IHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than IHG's 14.98% return. Over the past 10 years, H has underperformed IHG with an annualized return of 15.00%, while IHG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.12% annualized return.


H

1D
0.38%
1M
16.94%
YTD
16.17%
6M
15.48%
1Y
40.49%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
19.00%
10Y*
15.00%

IHG

1D
1.45%
1M
14.96%
YTD
14.98%
6M
17.70%
1Y
39.91%
3Y*
34.74%
5Y*
19.86%
10Y*
17.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H vs. IHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H
Hyatt Hotels Corporation
16.17%2.56%20.86%44.76%-5.68%29.16%-17.04%34.06%-7.36%33.08%
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
14.98%14.53%39.13%59.59%-8.70%0.14%-5.17%27.65%-12.53%50.75%

Correlation

The correlation between H and IHG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009

0.61

The correlation between H and IHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

H:

$18.02B

IHG:

$24.68B

EPS

H:

-$0.35

IHG:

$8.92

PS Ratio

H:

2.87

IHG:

2.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

H:

$6.24B

IHG:

$10.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

H:

$1.72B

IHG:

$4.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

H:

$567.00M

IHG:

$2.53B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H vs. IHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H
H Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
H Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
H Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
H Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
H Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IHG
IHG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H vs. IHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.08

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

9.17

-2.92

H vs. IHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the IHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H and IHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.56

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.74

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.56

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.64

-0.26

Drawdowns

H vs. IHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H drawdown since its inception was -60.54%, smaller than the maximum IHG drawdown of -77.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H and IHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.54%

-77.84%

+17.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.86%

-13.04%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.28%

-28.92%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.28%

-34.44%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.54%

-59.29%

-1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-13.87%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

4.36%

+2.14%

Volatility

H vs. IHG - Volatility Comparison

Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that H's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

6.77%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.13%

19.18%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.36%

25.80%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.49%

26.84%

+7.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.25%

30.53%

+4.72%

Dividends

H vs. IHG - Dividend Comparison

H's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than IHG's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H
Hyatt Hotels Corporation
0.32%0.37%0.38%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.27%0.85%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
1.15%1.23%1.26%1.57%2.22%0.00%0.00%5.52%1.97%8.04%30.47%2.72%

Financials

H vs. IHG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hyatt Hotels Corporation and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.75B
2.67B
(H) Total Revenue
(IHG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

H vs. IHG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hyatt Hotels Corporation and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
45.9%
36.7%
Portfolio components
H - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hyatt Hotels Corporation reported a gross profit of 803.00M and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

IHG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a gross profit of 979.00M and revenue of 2.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

H - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hyatt Hotels Corporation reported an operating income of 673.00M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.5%.

IHG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported an operating income of 575.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

H - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hyatt Hotels Corporation reported a net income of 38.00M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

IHG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


H and IHG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

H has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to IHG (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, H dropped -60.54% vs IHG's -77.84%.

IHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H and IHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer