PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GYLD vs. PFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GYLD vs. PFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GYLD achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than PFF's 2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GYLD has outperformed PFF with an annualized return of 4.68%, while PFF has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.


GYLD

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
7.91%
6M
10.25%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
4.68%

PFF

1D
-0.67%
1M
0.34%
YTD
2.93%
6M
3.41%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
3.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GYLD vs. PFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.91%19.85%3.83%10.36%-7.73%18.03%-11.17%13.29%-9.97%4.33%
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
2.93%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%7.89%15.93%-4.64%8.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GYLD and PFF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2012

0.37

The correlation between GYLD and PFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GYLD vs. PFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GYLD
PFF

Real Estate

34.8%
10.7%

Energy

30.0%
0.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
52.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%
1.6%

Utilities

4.6%
8.9%

Industrials

4.3%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
1.2%

Healthcare

-

1.3%

Technology

-

4.4%

Real Estate

GYLD
34.8%
PFF
10.7%

Energy

GYLD
30.0%
PFF
0.4%

Financial Services

GYLD
12.0%
PFF
52.3%

Basic Materials

GYLD
7.5%
PFF
1.6%

Utilities

GYLD
4.6%
PFF
8.9%

Industrials

GYLD
4.3%
PFF
5.5%

Communication Services

GYLD
2.7%
PFF
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GYLD
2.5%
PFF
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

GYLD
1.6%
PFF
1.2%

Healthcare

GYLD

-

PFF
1.3%

Technology

GYLD

-

PFF
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GYLD vs. PFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GYLD
GYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GYLD vs. PFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GYLDPFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.78

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

5.51

+3.68

GYLD vs. PFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the PFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GYLD and PFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GYLDPFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.39

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.15

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.26

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.21

0.00

Drawdowns

GYLD vs. PFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, smaller than the maximum PFF drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and PFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GYLDPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

-65.55%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-5.28%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.37%

-10.63%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.24%

-21.05%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

-34.10%

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.11%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.41%

-5.77%

-8.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.70%

+0.04%

Volatility

GYLD vs. PFF - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) at 2.09%. This indicates that GYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GYLDPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.09%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

5.09%

+4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

6.75%

+6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

10.30%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

12.66%

+3.92%

GYLD vs. PFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PFF's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

GYLD vs. PFF - Dividend Comparison

GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than PFF's 5.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.37%8.43%12.90%7.13%4.64%5.50%7.42%5.83%8.17%6.78%7.29%10.35%
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
5.47%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


GYLD and PFF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GYLD has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to PFF (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GYLD dropped -55.03% vs PFF's -65.55%.

On 10-year performance, GYLD leads with 4.68% vs 3.30% for PFF. On fees, PFF is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PFF has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GYLD has performed better with a 4.68% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFF is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GYLD.

GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 5.47% for PFF.

GYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while PFF is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. GYLD tracks DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Yield, while PFF tracks S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 0.46% for PFF.

PFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GYLD and PFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer