PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GXO vs. LULU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GXOLULU
YTD Return-1.90%-37.24%
1Y Return11.42%-23.04%
3Y Return (Ann)-15.30%-10.87%
Sharpe Ratio0.37-0.63
Sortino Ratio0.84-0.68
Omega Ratio1.090.91
Calmar Ratio0.22-0.41
Martin Ratio0.77-0.66
Ulcer Index16.11%33.87%
Daily Std Dev33.68%35.45%
Max Drawdown-67.94%-92.24%
Current Drawdown-42.07%-37.24%

Fundamentals


GXOLULU
Market Cap$7.17B$39.40B
EPS$0.89$12.93
PE Ratio67.4224.82
PEG Ratio1.471.56
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.60B$7.79B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$8.93B$4.59B
EBITDA (TTM)$275.28M$2.28B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GXO and LULU is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GXO vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GXO achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -37.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.21%
-8.92%
GXO
LULU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GXO vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GXO, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GXO, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GXO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GXO, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GXO, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.77
LULU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LULU, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.91
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.66

GXO vs. LULU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXO and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.37
-0.63
GXO
LULU

Dividends

GXO vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXO nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GXO vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXO drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXO and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-42.07%
-37.24%
GXO
LULU

Volatility

GXO vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) is 9.73%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that GXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.73%
11.15%
GXO
LULU

Financials

GXO vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GXO Logistics, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items