GXO vs. LULU
GXO (GXO Logistics, Inc.) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. GXO operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, GXO returned -2.86%/yr vs -21.55%/yr for LULU. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GXO vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXO achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -42.80% return.
GXO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- -8.83%
- 5Y*
- -2.86%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.67%
LULU
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -31.88%
- YTD
- -42.80%
- 1Y
- -38.51%
- 3Y*
- -32.19%
- 5Y*
- -21.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $61.95M | $66.43M | $72.65M | |
| $288.12M | $294.91M | $421.96M |
GXO vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXO GXO Logistics, Inc. | -4.71% | 21.01% | -28.88% | 43.27% | -53.00% | 87.28% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.80% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXO and LULU is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
GXO:
$5.77B
LULU:
$13.50B
GXO:
$1.11
LULU:
$12.35
GXO:
45.29
LULU:
9.63
GXO:
0.57
LULU:
1.25
GXO:
1.96K
LULU:
2.73
GXO:
$10.20B
LULU:
$11.20B
GXO:
$1.34B
LULU:
$6.24B
GXO:
$655.10M
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXO vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
GXO
LULU
GXO vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.85 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | -0.80 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | -1.51 | +1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXO vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXO drawdown since its inception was -69.56%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXO and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.56% | -92.26% | +22.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.60% | -51.16% | +20.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.74% | -79.38% | +27.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.56% | -79.38% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.57% | -76.75% | +25.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.22% | -27.95% | -17.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.25% | 26.95% | -12.70% |
Volatility
GXO vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) has a higher volatility of 11.76% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 8.86%. This indicates that GXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 8.86% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.34% | 31.60% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.45% | 45.09% | -5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.19% | 42.51% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.69% | 40.80% | +2.89% |
Dividends
GXO vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither GXO nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GXO vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GXO Logistics, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GXO vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
GXO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GXO Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
GXO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GXO Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.00K and revenue of 3.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
GXO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GXO Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 29.00K and revenue of 3.30M, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GXO and LULU have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXO has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to LULU (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXO dropped -69.56% vs LULU's -92.26%.
GXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXO and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer