PortfoliosLab logo
GXO vs. LULU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GXO and LULU is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GXO vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GXO:

-0.48

LULU:

-0.18

Sortino Ratio

GXO:

-0.46

LULU:

0.04

Omega Ratio

GXO:

0.94

LULU:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

GXO:

-0.31

LULU:

-0.15

Martin Ratio

GXO:

-0.89

LULU:

-0.39

Ulcer Index

GXO:

24.44%

LULU:

20.85%

Daily Std Dev

GXO:

44.71%

LULU:

44.52%

Max Drawdown

GXO:

-69.56%

LULU:

-92.26%

Current Drawdown

GXO:

-60.12%

LULU:

-37.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GXO:

$4.70B

LULU:

$37.95B

EPS

GXO:

$0.62

LULU:

$14.63

PE Ratio

GXO:

66.24

LULU:

21.59

PEG Ratio

GXO:

1.42

LULU:

1.28

PS Ratio

GXO:

0.38

LULU:

3.58

PB Ratio

GXO:

1.64

LULU:

9.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

GXO:

$12.23B

LULU:

$8.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GXO:

$1.56B

LULU:

$5.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

GXO:

$691.00M

LULU:

$2.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXO achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -16.59% return.


GXO

YTD

-5.06%

1M

21.94%

6M

-30.88%

1Y

-21.48%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LULU

YTD

-16.59%

1M

24.77%

6M

-3.42%

1Y

-8.04%

5Y*

5.26%

10Y*

17.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GXO vs. LULU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GXO is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GXO is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GXO is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GXO is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GXO is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GXO is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LULU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LULU is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LULU is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LULU is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LULU is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LULU is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LULU is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GXO vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GXO Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXO and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GXO vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXO nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GXO vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXO drawdown since its inception was -69.56%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXO and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GXO vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) is 8.88%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that GXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GXO vs. LULU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GXO Logistics, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20212022202320242025
2.98B
3.61B
(GXO) Total Revenue
(LULU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GXO vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GXO Logistics, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
10.4%
60.4%
(GXO) Gross Margin
(LULU) Gross Margin
GXO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GXO Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 310.00M and revenue of 2.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.4%.

LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

GXO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GXO Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of -56.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.9%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

GXO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, GXO Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of -96.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in a net margin of -3.2%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 748.40M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.