GXC vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GXC and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GXC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P China BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both GXC and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GXC or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between GXC and VOO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GXC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GXC:
0.81
VOO:
0.57
GXC:
1.33
VOO:
0.92
GXC:
1.19
VOO:
1.13
GXC:
0.50
VOO:
0.58
GXC:
1.98
VOO:
2.42
GXC:
13.92%
VOO:
4.51%
GXC:
34.09%
VOO:
19.17%
GXC:
-72.16%
VOO:
-33.99%
GXC:
-41.47%
VOO:
-10.56%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 0.22%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.02% annualized return.
GXC
8.32%
-5.33%
4.82%
24.79%
-0.61%
0.22%
VOO
-6.43%
-4.99%
-5.02%
9.61%
15.88%
12.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GXC vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GXC
VOO
GXC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GXC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VOO's 1.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 2.59% | 2.80% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% | 2.11% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.39% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
GXC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -72.16%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GXC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 14.22% and 13.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.