PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWRS vs. YORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWRS vs. YORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and The York Water Company (YORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWRS achieves a -13.30% return, which is significantly lower than YORW's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GWRS has underperformed YORW with an annualized return of 1.11%, while YORW has yielded a comparatively higher 2.08% annualized return.


GWRS

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-15.74%
YTD
-13.30%
1Y
-22.85%
3Y*
-14.57%
5Y*
-14.31%
10Y*
1.11%
ALL TIME*
1.42%

YORW

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.43%
6M
-6.44%
YTD
-1.33%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
-6.40%
5Y*
-6.39%
10Y*
2.08%
ALL TIME*
9.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$592.02K$608.89K$849.14K
$3.68M$5.44M$4.49M

GWRS vs. YORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
-13.30%-24.33%-9.94%0.95%-20.68%20.65%12.34%33.21%11.84%5.74%
YORW
The York Water Company
-1.33%0.08%-13.23%-12.40%-7.93%8.61%2.67%46.40%-3.34%-9.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GWRS and YORW is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWRS:

$205.95M

YORW:

$502.00M

EPS

GWRS:

$0.07

YORW:

$2.21

PE Ratio

GWRS:

99.46

YORW:

14.01

PEG Ratio

GWRS:

65.64

YORW:

5.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWRS:

$56.59M

YORW:

-$18.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWRS:

$16.24M

YORW:

-$40.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

GWRS:

$19.29M

YORW:

$31.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWRS vs. YORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWRS
GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

YORW
YORW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
YORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
YORW Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
YORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
YORW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWRS vs. YORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and The York Water Company (YORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWRSYORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.06

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

0.38

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

0.78

-1.73

GWRS vs. YORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the YORW Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWRS and YORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWRS vs. YORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -63.38%, which is greater than YORW's maximum drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and YORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWRSYORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.38%

-46.68%

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-13.93%

-24.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.36%

-26.79%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.38%

-39.62%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.38%

-39.62%

-23.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.21%

-35.04%

-25.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.51%

-13.18%

-9.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.62%

6.84%

+16.78%

Volatility

GWRS vs. YORW - Volatility Comparison

Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to The York Water Company (YORW) at 7.20%. This indicates that GWRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWRSYORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

7.20%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.81%

14.54%

+12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.79%

20.48%

+13.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.25%

22.92%

+9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.61%

29.22%

+4.39%

Dividends

GWRS vs. YORW - Dividend Comparison

GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than YORW's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
4.24%3.60%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.81%2.94%1.90%0.00%
YORW
The York Water Company
2.92%2.78%2.60%2.12%1.75%1.52%1.56%1.52%2.10%1.91%1.64%2.42%

Financials

GWRS vs. YORW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Water Resources, Inc. and The York Water Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GWRS and YORW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWRS has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to YORW (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWRS dropped -63.38% vs YORW's -46.68%.

YORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWRS and YORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer