PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWRS vs. XYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWRS vs. XYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWRS achieves a -14.63% return, which is significantly higher than XYL's -18.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GWRS has underperformed XYL with an annualized return of 2.23%, while XYL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


GWRS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.93%
YTD
-14.63%
6M
-17.31%
1Y
-27.65%
3Y*
-13.97%
5Y*
-14.50%
10Y*
2.23%

XYL

1D
-0.54%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
-18.86%
6M
-21.57%
1Y
-12.61%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWRS vs. XYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
-14.63%-24.33%-9.94%0.95%-20.68%20.65%12.34%33.21%11.84%5.74%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
-18.86%18.78%2.57%4.77%-6.60%18.94%30.90%19.59%-1.01%39.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GWRS and XYL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2016

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWRS:

$204.18M

XYL:

$26.69B

EPS

GWRS:

$0.07

XYL:

$4.02

PE Ratio

GWRS:

98.38

XYL:

27.26

PEG Ratio

GWRS:

64.93

XYL:

1.72

PS Ratio

GWRS:

3.48

XYL:

3.84

PB Ratio

GWRS:

2.42

XYL:

2.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWRS:

$56.59M

XYL:

$6.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWRS:

$16.24M

XYL:

$2.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

GWRS:

$19.29M

XYL:

$1.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWRS vs. XYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWRS
GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XYL
XYL Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWRS vs. XYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWRSXYLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.82

-0.52

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.99

-0.62

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.92

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.42

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-0.99

-0.40

GWRS vs. XYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the XYL Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWRS and XYL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWRSXYLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.82

-0.52

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.02

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.39

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.47

-0.36

Drawdowns

GWRS vs. XYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -63.38%, which is greater than XYL's maximum drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and XYL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWRSXYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.38%

-46.69%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-30.04%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.36%

-30.04%

-18.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.38%

-46.69%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.38%

-46.69%

-16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.82%

-27.55%

-33.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-10.37%

-11.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.87%

12.74%

+7.13%

Volatility

GWRS vs. XYL - Volatility Comparison

Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Xylem Inc. (XYL) at 6.33%. This indicates that GWRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWRSXYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.91%

6.33%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.72%

19.01%

+6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.83%

24.24%

+9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.07%

26.04%

+6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.67%

27.28%

+6.39%

Dividends

GWRS vs. XYL - Dividend Comparison

GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than XYL's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
4.28%3.60%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.81%2.94%1.90%0.00%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
1.51%1.17%1.24%1.15%1.09%0.93%1.02%1.22%1.26%1.06%1.25%1.54%

Financials

GWRS vs. XYL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Water Resources, Inc. and Xylem Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
13.29M
0
(GWRS) Total Revenue
(XYL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GWRS and XYL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWRS has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to XYL (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWRS dropped -63.38% vs XYL's -46.69%.

XYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWRS and XYL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer