PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWRS vs. XYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWRS vs. XYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GWRS having a -11.73% return and XYL slightly lower at -11.92%. Over the past 10 years, GWRS has underperformed XYL with an annualized return of 2.15%, while XYL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


GWRS

1D
1.82%
1M
1.60%
6M
-13.91%
YTD
-11.73%
1Y
-21.45%
3Y*
-13.96%
5Y*
-13.91%
10Y*
2.15%
ALL TIME*
1.60%

XYL

1D
1.80%
1M
0.81%
6M
-14.25%
YTD
-11.92%
1Y
-15.16%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
11.01%
ALL TIME*
13.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$594.44K$608.27K$853.66K
$276.04M$249.63M$231.48M

GWRS vs. XYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
-11.73%-24.33%-9.94%0.95%-20.68%20.65%12.34%33.21%11.84%5.74%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
-11.92%18.78%2.57%4.77%-6.60%18.94%30.90%19.59%-1.01%39.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GWRS and XYL is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWRS:

$209.69M

XYL:

$27.80B

EPS

GWRS:

$0.07

XYL:

$4.17

PE Ratio

GWRS:

101.26

XYL:

28.53

PEG Ratio

GWRS:

66.83

XYL:

1.80

PS Ratio

GWRS:

3.58

XYL:

4.24

PB Ratio

GWRS:

2.49

XYL:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWRS:

$56.59M

XYL:

$6.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWRS:

$16.24M

XYL:

$2.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

GWRS:

$19.29M

XYL:

$1.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWRS vs. XYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWRS
GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XYL
XYL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWRS vs. XYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWRSXYLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.91

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.51

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-0.96

+0.05

GWRS vs. XYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is comparable to the XYL Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWRS and XYL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWRS vs. XYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -63.38%, which is greater than XYL's maximum drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and XYL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWRSXYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.38%

-46.69%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-30.04%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.36%

-30.04%

-18.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.38%

-46.69%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.38%

-46.69%

-16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.49%

-21.35%

-38.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-10.50%

-12.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.71%

15.84%

+7.87%

Volatility

GWRS vs. XYL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) is 8.33%, while Xylem Inc. (XYL) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that GWRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWRSXYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

9.51%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.88%

20.17%

+6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.88%

24.02%

+9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

26.35%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.51%

27.41%

+6.10%

Dividends

GWRS vs. XYL - Dividend Comparison

GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than XYL's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
4.17%3.60%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.81%2.94%1.90%0.00%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
1.39%1.17%1.24%1.15%1.09%0.93%1.02%1.22%1.26%1.06%1.25%1.54%

Financials

GWRS vs. XYL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Water Resources, Inc. and Xylem Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GWRS and XYL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYL has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to GWRS (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWRS dropped -63.38% vs XYL's -46.69%.

XYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWRS and XYL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer