GWRS vs. CGW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW).

CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007.

Performance

GWRS vs. CGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GWRS vs. CGW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc.	-8.65%	-24.33%	-9.94%	0.95%	-20.68%	20.65%	12.34%	33.21%	11.84%	5.74%
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF	2.46%	18.10%	4.55%	15.50%	-22.00%	31.70%	15.41%	34.04%	-10.47%	27.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWRS achieves a -8.65% return, which is significantly lower than CGW's 2.46% return.

GWRS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -15.74%
• YTD: -8.65%
• 6M: -21.97%
• 1Y: -23.77%
• 3Y*: -12.60%
• 5Y*: -12.18%
• 10Y*: —

CGW

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -4.82%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 17.20%
• 3Y*: 10.96%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GWRS vs. CGW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWRS

GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 12
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CGW

CGW Risk / Return Rank: 61
CGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CGW Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWRS vs. CGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GWRS	CGW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	1.17	-1.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	1.68	-2.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.22	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	1.72	-2.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	5.86	-7.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GWRS vs. CGW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the CGW Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWRS and CGW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GWRS	CGW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.75	1.17	-1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	0.43	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.35	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between GWRS and CGW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GWRS vs. CGW - Dividend Comparison

GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than CGW's 1.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc.	3.97%	3.60%	2.62%	2.28%	2.22%	1.71%	2.01%	2.18%	2.81%	2.94%	1.90%	0.00%
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF	1.54%	1.58%	2.27%	1.55%	1.45%	1.59%	1.41%	1.48%	2.14%	1.71%	1.65%	1.67%

Drawdowns

GWRS vs. CGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than CGW's maximum drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and CGW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GWRS	CGW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.89%	-57.24%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.97%	-10.33%	-23.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.89%	-32.74%	-28.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.08%	-6.24%	-51.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.11%	-9.87%	-11.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.76%	3.03%	+11.73%

Volatility

GWRS vs. CGW - Volatility Comparison

Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a higher volatility of 18.16% compared to Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) at 5.50%. This indicates that GWRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GWRS	CGW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.16%	5.50%	+12.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.66%	9.30%	+17.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.93%	14.81%	+17.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.96%	16.71%	+15.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.74%	17.67%	+16.07%