PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GWRS vs. CGW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GWRSCGW
YTD Return5.14%11.60%
1Y Return36.44%27.40%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.77%0.81%
5Y Return (Ann)4.11%10.30%
Sharpe Ratio1.151.90
Sortino Ratio1.792.77
Omega Ratio1.211.33
Calmar Ratio0.791.28
Martin Ratio6.579.34
Ulcer Index5.78%2.90%
Daily Std Dev32.90%14.29%
Max Drawdown-51.69%-57.24%
Current Drawdown-29.19%-3.33%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GWRS and CGW is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GWRS vs. CGW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GWRS achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than CGW's 11.60% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.87%
0.96%
GWRS
CGW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GWRS vs. CGW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWRS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.79
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GWRS, currently valued at 6.57, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.57
CGW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGW, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGW, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGW, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGW, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGW, currently valued at 9.34, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.34

GWRS vs. CGW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the CGW Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWRS and CGW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.15
1.90
GWRS
CGW

Dividends

GWRS vs. CGW - Dividend Comparison

GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than CGW's 1.39% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
2.23%2.29%2.26%1.69%2.00%2.19%2.84%2.97%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
1.39%1.55%1.45%1.59%1.41%1.48%2.14%1.71%1.65%1.67%1.77%1.52%

Drawdowns

GWRS vs. CGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -51.69%, smaller than the maximum CGW drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and CGW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-29.19%
-3.33%
GWRS
CGW

Volatility

GWRS vs. CGW - Volatility Comparison

Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) at 4.07%. This indicates that GWRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.54%
4.07%
GWRS
CGW