GWRS vs. CGW
Compare and contrast key facts about Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW).
CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GWRS or CGW.
Correlation
The correlation between GWRS and CGW is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GWRS vs. CGW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GWRS:
-0.28
CGW:
0.39
GWRS:
-0.20
CGW:
0.62
GWRS:
0.98
CGW:
1.08
GWRS:
-0.20
CGW:
0.38
GWRS:
-1.04
CGW:
1.05
GWRS:
7.91%
CGW:
5.04%
GWRS:
29.82%
CGW:
13.69%
GWRS:
-51.67%
CGW:
-57.24%
GWRS:
-40.97%
CGW:
-8.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWRS achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than CGW's 2.07% return.
GWRS
-2.71%
-5.63%
-7.80%
-8.99%
-2.27%
N/A
CGW
2.07%
1.58%
-6.70%
5.22%
6.39%
8.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GWRS vs. CGW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GWRS
CGW
GWRS vs. CGW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GWRS vs. CGW - Dividend Comparison
GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than CGW's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc. | 2.69% | 2.61% | 2.29% | 2.26% | 1.69% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 2.84% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
GWRS vs. CGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -51.67%, smaller than the maximum CGW drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and CGW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GWRS vs. CGW - Volatility Comparison
Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) at 3.37%. This indicates that GWRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.