GWRS vs. CGW
Compare and contrast key facts about Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW).
CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GWRS or CGW.
Performance
GWRS vs. CGW - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWRS achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than CGW's 11.58% return.
GWRS
4.01%
6.43%
8.01%
17.82%
3.28%
N/A
CGW
11.58%
-0.17%
0.99%
20.33%
10.14%
9.21%
Key characteristics
GWRS | CGW | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.58 | 1.49 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.03 | 2.14 |
Omega Ratio | 1.12 | 1.26 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.45 | 1.29 |
Martin Ratio | 3.07 | 6.70 |
Ulcer Index | 5.80% | 3.03% |
Daily Std Dev | 30.50% | 13.67% |
Max Drawdown | -51.67% | -57.24% |
Current Drawdown | -29.92% | -3.35% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between GWRS and CGW is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GWRS vs. CGW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GWRS vs. CGW - Dividend Comparison
GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than CGW's 1.39% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Water Resources, Inc. | 2.25% | 2.29% | 2.26% | 1.69% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 2.84% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 1.39% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
GWRS vs. CGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -51.67%, smaller than the maximum CGW drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and CGW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GWRS vs. CGW - Volatility Comparison
Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) at 3.53%. This indicates that GWRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.