PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWRS vs. AWK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWRS vs. AWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWRS achieves a -14.63% return, which is significantly lower than AWK's -3.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GWRS has underperformed AWK with an annualized return of 2.23%, while AWK has yielded a comparatively higher 7.01% annualized return.


GWRS

1D
-3.79%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-14.63%
6M
-13.97%
1Y
-26.56%
3Y*
-13.97%
5Y*
-14.19%
10Y*
2.23%

AWK

1D
2.11%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-4.09%
1Y
-10.87%
3Y*
-3.05%
5Y*
-2.52%
10Y*
7.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWRS vs. AWK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
-14.63%-24.33%-9.94%0.95%-20.68%20.65%12.34%33.21%11.84%5.74%
AWK
American Water Works Company, Inc.
-3.90%7.40%-3.53%-11.68%-17.89%24.83%26.88%37.79%1.32%29.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GWRS and AWK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2016

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWRS:

$204.18M

AWK:

$24.12B

EPS

GWRS:

$0.07

AWK:

$5.65

PE Ratio

GWRS:

98.38

AWK:

21.89

PS Ratio

GWRS:

3.48

AWK:

4.63

PB Ratio

GWRS:

2.42

AWK:

2.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWRS:

$56.59M

AWK:

$5.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWRS:

$16.24M

AWK:

$2.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

GWRS:

$19.29M

AWK:

$2.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWRS vs. AWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWRS
GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AWK
AWK Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWK Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWK Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWRS vs. AWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWRSAWKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.79

-0.51

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.94

-0.61

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.93

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.73

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.40

-1.39

-0.01

GWRS vs. AWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the AWK Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWRS and AWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWRSAWKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.79

-0.51

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

-0.11

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.30

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.57

-0.45

Drawdowns

GWRS vs. AWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWRS drawdown since its inception was -63.38%, which is greater than AWK's maximum drawdown of -37.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWRS and AWK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWRSAWKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.38%

-37.10%

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-15.45%

-22.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.36%

-22.33%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.38%

-37.10%

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.38%

-37.10%

-26.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.82%

-27.80%

-33.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.76%

-9.48%

-12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.75%

8.05%

+11.70%

Volatility

GWRS vs. AWK - Volatility Comparison

Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) at 5.11%. This indicates that GWRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWRSAWKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.93%

5.11%

+7.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.76%

15.23%

+10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.86%

21.31%

+12.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.07%

22.87%

+9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.68%

23.69%

+9.99%

Dividends

GWRS vs. AWK - Dividend Comparison

GWRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than AWK's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWK
American Water Works Company, Inc.
2.73%2.49%2.41%2.10%1.68%1.25%1.40%1.59%1.96%1.77%2.02%2.23%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
4.28%3.60%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.81%2.94%1.90%0.00%

Financials

GWRS vs. AWK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Water Resources, Inc. and American Water Works Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
13.29M
1.21B
(GWRS) Total Revenue
(AWK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GWRS vs. AWK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Global Water Resources, Inc. and American Water Works Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
59.2%
Portfolio components
GWRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AWK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 714.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.

GWRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 389.00K and revenue of 13.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.9%.

AWK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 391.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.

GWRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -366.00K and revenue of 13.29M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.

AWK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GWRS and AWK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWRS has higher volatility (12.93%) compared to AWK (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWRS dropped -63.38% vs AWK's -37.10%.

AWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWRS and AWK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer