PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GVA vs. FLR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GVAFLR
YTD Return93.74%30.02%
1Y Return123.23%47.92%
3Y Return (Ann)34.73%30.95%
5Y Return (Ann)30.69%22.49%
10Y Return (Ann)11.91%-1.45%
Sharpe Ratio5.121.35
Sortino Ratio6.391.80
Omega Ratio1.761.27
Calmar Ratio4.250.84
Martin Ratio27.607.97
Ulcer Index4.36%6.12%
Daily Std Dev23.48%36.09%
Max Drawdown-84.72%-95.89%
Current Drawdown0.00%-38.37%

Fundamentals


GVAFLR
Market Cap$4.28B$8.74B
EPS$2.36$2.01
PE Ratio41.5025.34
PEG Ratio5.560.38
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.96B$15.88B
Gross Profit (TTM)$516.26M$431.00M
EBITDA (TTM)$242.12M$346.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GVA and FLR is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GVA vs. FLR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GVA achieves a 93.74% return, which is significantly higher than FLR's 30.02% return. Over the past 10 years, GVA has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 11.91%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower -1.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
57.70%
31.77%
GVA
FLR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GVA vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GVA, currently valued at 5.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GVA, currently valued at 6.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.006.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GVA, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.76
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GVA, currently valued at 4.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GVA, currently valued at 27.60, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0027.60
FLR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLR, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLR, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLR, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLR, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLR, currently valued at 7.97, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.97

GVA vs. FLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVA Sharpe Ratio is 5.12, which is higher than the FLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVA and FLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.12
1.35
GVA
FLR

Dividends

GVA vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison

GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GVA
Granite Construction Incorporated
0.53%1.02%1.48%1.34%1.95%1.88%1.29%0.82%0.95%1.21%1.37%1.49%
FLR
Fluor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%3.87%2.61%1.63%1.60%1.78%1.39%0.80%

Drawdowns

GVA vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVA drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVA and FLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-38.37%
GVA
FLR

Volatility

GVA vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) is 7.17%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 19.85%. This indicates that GVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.17%
19.85%
GVA
FLR

Financials

GVA vs. FLR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Construction Incorporated and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items