GVA vs. FLR
GVA (Granite Construction Incorporated) and FLR (Fluor Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, GVA returned 14.92%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for FLR. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GVA vs. FLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVA achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly lower than FLR's 37.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GVA has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 14.92%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.95% annualized return.
GVA
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 16.58%
- YTD
- 31.49%
- 6M
- 29.20%
- 1Y
- 70.99%
- 3Y*
- 58.05%
- 5Y*
- 32.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.92%
FLR
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 21.28%
- YTD
- 37.32%
- 6M
- 33.42%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 24.25%
- 5Y*
- 25.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
GVA vs. FLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVA Granite Construction Incorporated | 31.49% | 32.23% | 73.75% | 46.84% | -7.82% | 46.80% | -0.65% | -30.28% | -35.80% | 16.45% |
FLR Fluor Corporation | 37.32% | -19.65% | 25.91% | 13.01% | 39.93% | 55.10% | -14.55% | -39.54% | -36.61% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVA and FLR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2000 | 0.54 |
The correlation between GVA and FLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GVA:
$3.65
FLR:
$2.65
GVA:
41.50
FLR:
20.52
GVA:
0.18
FLR:
0.04
GVA:
1.66
FLR:
0.47
GVA:
$4.64B
FLR:
$15.19B
GVA:
$737.27M
FLR:
-$247.00M
GVA:
$472.98M
FLR:
-$276.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVA vs. FLR — Risk / Return Rank
GVA
FLR
GVA vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVA | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.09 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 0.32 | +4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 0.49 | +13.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVA vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVA drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVA and FLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVA | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -95.89% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.69% | -30.19% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.06% | -47.63% | +18.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.44% | -47.63% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.72% | -94.16% | +9.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -34.15% | +34.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.12% | -41.61% | +10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.16% | 19.55% | -14.39% |
Volatility
GVA vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) is 7.89%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 14.41%. This indicates that GVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVA | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 14.41% | -6.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.35% | 34.61% | -13.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.88% | 51.62% | -24.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.87% | 45.25% | -15.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.33% | 57.75% | -16.42% |
Dividends
GVA vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison
GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLR Fluor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.78% |
GVA Granite Construction Incorporated | 0.34% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 1.48% | 1.34% | 1.95% | 1.88% | 1.29% | 0.82% | 0.95% | 1.21% |
Financials
GVA vs. FLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Construction Incorporated and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GVA vs. FLR - Profitability Comparison
GVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a gross profit of 109.91M and revenue of 912.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.0%.
FLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.
GVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported an operating income of -31.05M and revenue of 912.47M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.4%.
FLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
GVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a net income of -41.70M and revenue of 912.47M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
FLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GVA and FLR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLR has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to GVA (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVA dropped -84.72% vs FLR's -95.89%.
GVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVA and FLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer