PortfoliosLab logo
GVA vs. FLR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GVA and FLR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GVA vs. FLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GVA:

1.66

FLR:

0.04

Sortino Ratio

GVA:

2.20

FLR:

0.32

Omega Ratio

GVA:

1.27

FLR:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

GVA:

1.40

FLR:

0.01

Martin Ratio

GVA:

3.42

FLR:

0.02

Ulcer Index

GVA:

11.92%

FLR:

21.59%

Daily Std Dev

GVA:

26.56%

FLR:

44.86%

Max Drawdown

GVA:

-84.72%

FLR:

-95.89%

Current Drawdown

GVA:

-11.85%

FLR:

-50.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GVA:

$3.85B

FLR:

$6.76B

EPS

GVA:

$2.55

FLR:

$10.54

PE Ratio

GVA:

34.53

FLR:

3.89

PEG Ratio

GVA:

5.56

FLR:

0.31

PS Ratio

GVA:

0.95

FLR:

0.41

PB Ratio

GVA:

3.79

FLR:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

GVA:

$4.03B

FLR:

$16.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GVA:

$602.26M

FLR:

$614.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

GVA:

$371.06M

FLR:

$607.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVA achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FLR's -16.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GVA has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 10.90%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower -2.15% annualized return.


GVA

YTD

0.55%

1M

10.05%

6M

-11.05%

1Y

42.01%

3Y*

41.76%

5Y*

41.95%

10Y*

10.90%

FLR

YTD

-16.79%

1M

15.28%

6M

-26.44%

1Y

-2.19%

3Y*

16.55%

5Y*

30.56%

10Y*

-2.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Granite Construction Incorporated

Fluor Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GVA vs. FLR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GVA is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GVA is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GVA is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GVA is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GVA is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GVA is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FLR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLR is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLR is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLR is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLR is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLR is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLR is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GVA vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GVA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the FLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVA and FLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GVA vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison

GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GVA
Granite Construction Incorporated
0.59%0.59%1.02%1.48%1.34%1.95%1.88%1.29%0.82%0.95%1.21%1.37%
FLR
Fluor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%3.87%2.61%1.63%1.60%1.78%1.39%

Drawdowns

GVA vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVA drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVA and FLR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GVA vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) is 5.80%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 12.10%. This indicates that GVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GVA vs. FLR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Construction Incorporated and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
699.55M
3.98B
(GVA) Total Revenue
(FLR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GVA vs. FLR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Granite Construction Incorporated and Fluor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20212022202320242025
12.0%
3.5%
(GVA) Gross Margin
(FLR) Gross Margin
GVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a gross profit of 83.85M and revenue of 699.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.0%.

FLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

GVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Granite Construction Incorporated reported an operating income of -32.06M and revenue of 699.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

FLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 91.00M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

GVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a net income of -33.66M and revenue of 699.55M, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.

FLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of -241.00M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in a net margin of -6.1%.