GVA vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Performance
GVA vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GVA vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVA Granite Construction Incorporated | 4.04% | 32.23% | 73.75% | 46.84% | -7.82% | 46.80% | -0.65% | -30.28% | -35.80% | 16.45% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -9.86% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | 9.04% | 36.32% |
Fundamentals
GVA:
$6.42B
CTAS:
$68.81B
GVA:
$3.64
CTAS:
$4.75
GVA:
32.94
CTAS:
35.63
GVA:
0.14
CTAS:
2.50
GVA:
1.44
CTAS:
6.26
GVA:
5.44
CTAS:
14.37
GVA:
$4.42B
CTAS:
$11.03B
GVA:
$711.22M
CTAS:
$1.33B
GVA:
$467.37M
CTAS:
$2.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVA achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GVA has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 11.04%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.61% annualized return.
GVA
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -10.74%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 59.76%
- 3Y*
- 44.02%
- 5Y*
- 25.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
CTAS
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -15.91%
- YTD
- -9.86%
- 6M
- -17.21%
- 1Y
- -17.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVA vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
GVA
CTAS
GVA vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVA | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | -0.80 | +3.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | -1.02 | +4.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.87 | +0.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | -0.60 | +4.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.74 | -1.31 | +15.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVA | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | -0.80 | +3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.68 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.89 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.52 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GVA and CTAS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GVA vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than CTAS's 1.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVA Granite Construction Incorporated | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 1.48% | 1.34% | 1.95% | 1.88% | 1.29% | 0.82% | 0.95% | 1.21% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
GVA vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVA drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVA and CTAS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVA | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -65.32% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.69% | -26.72% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.44% | -26.72% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.72% | -48.38% | -36.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.88% | -25.20% | +13.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -14.99% | -16.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 12.22% | -7.82% |
Volatility
GVA vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 7.96%. This indicates that GVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GVA | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 7.96% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 14.35% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.86% | 21.38% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.65% | 22.49% | +7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.15% | 26.52% | +14.63% |
Financials
GVA vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Construction Incorporated and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GVA vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
GVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a gross profit of 167.72M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.4%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
GVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported an operating income of 74.98M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
GVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a net income of 52.03M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.