GVA vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GVA or CTAS.
Key characteristics
| GVA | CTAS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 73.72% | 38.62% |
| 1Y Return | 92.85% | 61.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 29.85% | 24.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 29.19% | 27.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.81% | 29.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.23 | 3.50 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.45 | 5.50 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.64 | 1.70 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.44 | 11.71 |
| Martin Ratio | 22.20 | 35.10 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.38% | 1.82% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.94% | 18.23% |
| Max Drawdown | -84.72% | -90.34% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -3.02% |
Fundamentals
| GVA | CTAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.84B | $83.71B |
| EPS | $2.36 | $3.95 |
| PE Ratio | 37.21 | 52.55 |
| PEG Ratio | 5.56 | 4.47 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.96B | $9.76B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $516.26M | $4.71B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $242.12M | $2.58B |
Correlation
The correlation between GVA and CTAS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GVA vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GVA achieves a 73.72% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's 38.62% return. Over the past 10 years, GVA has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 10.81%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 29.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GVA vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GVA vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CTAS's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVA Granite Construction Incorporated | 0.59% | 1.02% | 1.48% | 1.34% | 1.95% | 1.88% | 1.29% | 0.82% | 0.95% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.49% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 2.17% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
GVA vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVA drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum CTAS drawdown of -90.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVA and CTAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GVA vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 3.99%. This indicates that GVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GVA vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Construction Incorporated and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities