PortfoliosLab logo
GVA vs. CTAS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GVA and CTAS is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GVA vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GVA:

1.66

CTAS:

1.15

Sortino Ratio

GVA:

2.20

CTAS:

1.52

Omega Ratio

GVA:

1.27

CTAS:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

GVA:

1.40

CTAS:

1.43

Martin Ratio

GVA:

3.42

CTAS:

3.62

Ulcer Index

GVA:

11.92%

CTAS:

7.73%

Daily Std Dev

GVA:

26.56%

CTAS:

25.17%

Max Drawdown

GVA:

-84.72%

CTAS:

-65.32%

Current Drawdown

GVA:

-11.85%

CTAS:

-1.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GVA:

$3.85B

CTAS:

$89.76B

EPS

GVA:

$2.55

CTAS:

$4.30

PE Ratio

GVA:

34.53

CTAS:

51.70

PEG Ratio

GVA:

5.56

CTAS:

3.95

PS Ratio

GVA:

0.95

CTAS:

8.85

PB Ratio

GVA:

3.79

CTAS:

19.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

GVA:

$4.03B

CTAS:

$10.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GVA:

$602.26M

CTAS:

$5.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

GVA:

$371.06M

CTAS:

$2.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVA achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 22.12% return. Over the past 10 years, GVA has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 10.90%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.69% annualized return.


GVA

YTD

0.55%

1M

10.05%

6M

-11.05%

1Y

42.01%

3Y*

41.76%

5Y*

41.95%

10Y*

10.90%

CTAS

YTD

22.12%

1M

6.17%

6M

0.61%

1Y

31.21%

3Y*

35.05%

5Y*

31.17%

10Y*

27.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Granite Construction Incorporated

Cintas Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GVA vs. CTAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GVA is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GVA is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GVA is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GVA is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GVA is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GVA is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTAS is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTAS is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GVA vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GVA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVA and CTAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GVA vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CTAS's 0.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GVA
Granite Construction Incorporated
0.59%0.59%1.02%1.48%1.34%1.95%1.88%1.29%0.82%0.95%1.21%1.37%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
0.70%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.79%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%2.17%

Drawdowns

GVA vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVA drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVA and CTAS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GVA vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 3.70%. This indicates that GVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GVA vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Construction Incorporated and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
699.55M
2.61B
(GVA) Total Revenue
(CTAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GVA vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Granite Construction Incorporated and Cintas Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
12.0%
50.6%
(GVA) Gross Margin
(CTAS) Gross Margin
GVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a gross profit of 83.85M and revenue of 699.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.0%.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

GVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Granite Construction Incorporated reported an operating income of -32.06M and revenue of 699.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 609.85M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

GVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Granite Construction Incorporated reported a net income of -33.66M and revenue of 699.55M, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 463.50M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.