PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GVA vs. CTAS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GVA and CTAS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

GVA vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
41.31%
3.14%
GVA
CTAS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GVA:

4.46

CTAS:

1.61

Sortino Ratio

GVA:

5.62

CTAS:

2.08

Omega Ratio

GVA:

1.68

CTAS:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

GVA:

3.70

CTAS:

1.83

Martin Ratio

GVA:

26.52

CTAS:

6.96

Ulcer Index

GVA:

3.91%

CTAS:

5.14%

Daily Std Dev

GVA:

23.24%

CTAS:

22.23%

Max Drawdown

GVA:

-84.72%

CTAS:

-65.32%

Current Drawdown

GVA:

-7.68%

CTAS:

-12.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GVA:

$4.04B

CTAS:

$80.03B

EPS

GVA:

$2.36

CTAS:

$4.14

PE Ratio

GVA:

39.14

CTAS:

47.90

PEG Ratio

GVA:

5.56

CTAS:

4.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

GVA:

$3.03B

CTAS:

$9.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GVA:

$421.95M

CTAS:

$4.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

GVA:

$263.18M

CTAS:

$2.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVA achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GVA has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 11.75%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.21% annualized return.


GVA

YTD

5.31%

1M

2.02%

6M

41.31%

1Y

105.40%

5Y*

30.49%

10Y*

11.75%

CTAS

YTD

8.54%

1M

6.08%

6M

3.14%

1Y

33.48%

5Y*

24.19%

10Y*

27.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GVA vs. CTAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GVA is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GVA is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GVA is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GVA is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GVA is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GVA is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTAS is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GVA vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GVA, currently valued at 4.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.004.461.61
The chart of Sortino ratio for GVA, currently valued at 5.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.622.08
The chart of Omega ratio for GVA, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.681.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for GVA, currently valued at 3.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.701.83
The chart of Martin ratio for GVA, currently valued at 26.52, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0026.526.96
GVA
CTAS

The current GVA Sharpe Ratio is 4.46, which is higher than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVA and CTAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.46
1.61
GVA
CTAS

Dividends

GVA vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

GVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than CTAS's 0.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GVA
Granite Construction Incorporated
0.56%0.59%1.02%1.48%1.34%1.95%1.88%1.29%0.82%0.95%1.21%1.37%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
0.73%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.79%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%2.17%

Drawdowns

GVA vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVA drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVA and CTAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.68%
-12.43%
GVA
CTAS

Volatility

GVA vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) is 5.90%, while Cintas Corporation (CTAS) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that GVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.90%
12.96%
GVA
CTAS

Financials

GVA vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Construction Incorporated and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab