PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSH vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 69.71% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSH has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -36.58%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


GUSH

1D
1.40%
1M
-9.75%
YTD
69.71%
6M
53.49%
1Y
78.64%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
-36.58%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
69.71%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and VOO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2015

0.45

The correlation between GUSH and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GUSH vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUSH
VOO

Energy

97.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Energy

GUSH
97.2%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

GUSH
2.9%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

GUSH

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GUSH

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

GUSH

-

VOO
4.9%

Financial Services

GUSH

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

GUSH

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

GUSH

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

GUSH

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

GUSH

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

GUSH

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUSHVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

2.53

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

3.43

-1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.42

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.68

15.95

-9.27

GUSH vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSHVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.53

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.85

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.39

0.87

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.89

-1.33

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSHVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-33.99%

-65.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

-8.90%

-20.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

-18.69%

-44.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

-24.52%

-49.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

-33.99%

-65.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

0.00%

-99.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.91%

-3.69%

-89.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.46%

1.91%

+10.55%

Volatility

GUSH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSHVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.72%

2.74%

+17.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.44%

8.88%

+34.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.63%

11.78%

+43.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.20%

16.81%

+51.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.74%

18.01%

+75.73%

GUSH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.47%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSH and VOO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (20.72%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs -36.58% for GUSH. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs -36.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

GUSH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSH and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer