PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GTSGX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GTSGX and FSMDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

GTSGX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
171.60%
352.15%
GTSGX
FSMDX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GTSGX:

0.59

FSMDX:

1.54

Sortino Ratio

GTSGX:

0.86

FSMDX:

2.13

Omega Ratio

GTSGX:

1.12

FSMDX:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

GTSGX:

0.72

FSMDX:

2.25

Martin Ratio

GTSGX:

2.13

FSMDX:

6.64

Ulcer Index

GTSGX:

4.08%

FSMDX:

3.10%

Daily Std Dev

GTSGX:

14.85%

FSMDX:

13.35%

Max Drawdown

GTSGX:

-38.26%

FSMDX:

-40.35%

Current Drawdown

GTSGX:

-7.26%

FSMDX:

-3.71%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GTSGX having a 4.65% return and FSMDX slightly higher at 4.83%. Over the past 10 years, GTSGX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 7.52%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.05% annualized return.


GTSGX

YTD

4.65%

1M

-2.10%

6M

1.83%

1Y

8.29%

5Y*

8.12%

10Y*

7.52%

FSMDX

YTD

4.83%

1M

2.82%

6M

9.75%

1Y

20.34%

5Y*

9.88%

10Y*

9.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTSGX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
Expense ratio chart for GTSGX: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FSMDX: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GTSGX vs. FSMDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTSGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTSGX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTSGX is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTSGX is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTSGX is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTSGX is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTSGX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSMDX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSMDX is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSMDX is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSMDX is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSMDX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSMDX is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GTSGX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GTSGX, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.591.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for GTSGX, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.862.13
The chart of Omega ratio for GTSGX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.121.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for GTSGX, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.722.25
The chart of Martin ratio for GTSGX, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.136.64
GTSGX
FSMDX

The current GTSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSGX and FSMDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.59
1.54
GTSGX
FSMDX

Dividends

GTSGX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

GTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FSMDX's 1.12% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
0.71%0.75%0.13%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
1.12%1.17%1.39%1.59%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.85%1.32%1.35%2.29%3.82%

Drawdowns

GTSGX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSGX drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, smaller than the maximum FSMDX drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSGX and FSMDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.26%
-3.71%
GTSGX
FSMDX

Volatility

GTSGX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 3.63%. This indicates that GTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.77%
3.63%
GTSGX
FSMDX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab