GTLB vs. CYBR
GTLB (GitLab Inc.) and CYBR (CyberArk Software Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — GTLB in Software - Application, CYBR in Software - Infrastructure. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GTLB vs. CYBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTLB
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- 32.31%
- YTD
- -15.21%
- 6M
- -26.63%
- 1Y
- -30.14%
- 3Y*
- -1.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CYBR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTLB vs. CYBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLB GitLab Inc. | -15.21% | -33.40% | -10.50% | 38.56% | -47.77% | -16.26% |
CYBR CyberArk Software Ltd. | -8.34% | 33.89% | 52.09% | 68.95% | -25.18% | -4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTLB and CYBR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GTLB and CYBR has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GTLB:
$5.41B
CYBR:
$20.69B
GTLB:
-$0.15
CYBR:
-$2.92
GTLB:
5.29
CYBR:
15.13
GTLB:
5.49
CYBR:
8.61
GTLB:
$1.00B
CYBR:
$1.36B
GTLB:
$871.68M
CYBR:
$1.01B
GTLB:
-$42.85M
CYBR:
$59.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTLB vs. CYBR — Risk / Return Rank
GTLB
CYBR
GTLB vs. CYBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GitLab Inc. (GTLB) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTLB | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTLB | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GTLB vs. CYBR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTLB | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.69% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.98% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.61% | — | — |
Volatility
GTLB vs. CYBR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTLB | CYBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.93% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.64% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.64% | — | — |
Dividends
GTLB vs. CYBR - Dividend Comparison
Neither GTLB nor CYBR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GTLB vs. CYBR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GitLab Inc. and CyberArk Software Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GTLB vs. CYBR - Profitability Comparison
GTLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.67M and revenue of 264.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.8%.
CYBR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.
GTLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported an operating income of -15.75M and revenue of 264.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.
CYBR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.
GTLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported a net income of -4.97M and revenue of 264.16M, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.
CYBR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTLB and CYBR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GTLB and CYBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer