PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTIP vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTIP vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


GTIP

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.04%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTIP vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GTIP
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
1.70%6.63%2.04%3.88%-12.14%5.86%10.83%8.33%0.24%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GTIP and SPY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTIP vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTIP
GTIP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTIP vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTIPSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.16

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

14.72

-6.71

GTIP vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTIP and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTIPSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.38

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.82

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.59

-0.03

Drawdowns

GTIP vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTIPSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-55.19%

+40.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-8.88%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

-18.76%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.31%

-24.50%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.70%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-9.05%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

1.91%

-1.27%

Volatility

GTIP vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) is 0.97%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that GTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTIPSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

2.84%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

8.90%

-6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

11.83%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

17.05%

-10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

17.94%

-11.93%

GTIP vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GTIP vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTIP
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
4.69%4.58%3.52%2.77%6.47%3.82%1.04%2.34%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTIP and SPY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to GTIP (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTIP dropped -14.31% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 1.09% for GTIP. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GTIP.

GTIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

GTIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SPY is S&P 500. GTIP tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GTIP and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTIP and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer