GTIM vs. VOO
GTIM (Good Times Restaurants Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, GTIM returned -8.85%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GTIM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIM achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GTIM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -8.85%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
GTIM
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- -23.39%
- 3Y*
- -23.96%
- 5Y*
- -20.36%
- 10Y*
- -8.85%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
GTIM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIM Good Times Restaurants Inc. | 8.26% | -53.28% | 1.97% | 13.39% | -48.39% | 52.28% | 79.25% | -36.40% | -5.66% | -15.87% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIM and VOO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTIM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GTIM
VOO
GTIM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.43 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 3.16 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 14.73 | -15.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | 2.39 | -2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | 0.83 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.87 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.89 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
GTIM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIM drawdown since its inception was -95.45%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIM and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.45% | -33.99% | -61.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.33% | -8.90% | -35.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.62% | -18.69% | -48.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.96% | -24.52% | -55.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.28% | -33.99% | -57.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.77% | -0.70% | -86.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.04% | -3.69% | -54.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.73% | 1.91% | +28.82% |
Volatility
GTIM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that GTIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTIM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 2.84% | +3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | 8.90% | +16.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.70% | 11.80% | +39.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.36% | 16.81% | +32.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.44% | 18.01% | +43.43% |
Dividends
GTIM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GTIM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIM Good Times Restaurants Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTIM and VOO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTIM has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTIM dropped -95.45% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTIM and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer