PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTEK vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 34.87% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -0.51% return.


GTEK

1D
2.20%
1M
-9.56%
6M
29.82%
YTD
34.87%
1Y
54.17%
3Y*
26.54%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.22%

SWLGX

1D
2.95%
1M
-3.22%
6M
1.04%
YTD
-0.51%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.28M$1.64M$1.45M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
34.87%23.68%15.94%33.58%-46.73%-2.50%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
-0.51%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and SWLGX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.85

The correlation between GTEK and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GTEK
SWLGX

Technology

70.8%
54.2%

Industrials

8.9%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
8.3%

Communication Services

4.8%
16.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.3%

Real Estate

3.4%
0.4%

Financial Services

1.2%
4.3%

Healthcare

1.1%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.2%

Energy

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Technology

GTEK
70.8%
SWLGX
54.2%

Industrials

GTEK
8.9%
SWLGX
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GTEK
6.3%
SWLGX
8.3%

Communication Services

GTEK
4.8%
SWLGX
16.2%

Basic Materials

GTEK
3.5%
SWLGX
0.3%

Real Estate

GTEK
3.4%
SWLGX
0.4%

Financial Services

GTEK
1.2%
SWLGX
4.3%

Healthcare

GTEK
1.1%
SWLGX
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

GTEK

-

SWLGX
1.2%

Energy

GTEK

-

SWLGX
0.5%

Utilities

GTEK

-

SWLGX
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTEK vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTEK
GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTEKSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

0.45

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

1.35

+9.06

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTEK Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTEK and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTEKSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

-32.69%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.64%

-16.16%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

-23.30%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.28%

-8.74%

-5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.84%

-7.03%

-19.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

5.37%

-0.46%

Volatility

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a higher volatility of 12.14% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 6.40%. This indicates that GTEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTEKSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.14%

6.40%

+5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.35%

14.03%

+13.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.18%

17.49%

+13.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.98%

21.80%

+7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.98%

22.68%

+6.30%

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTEK vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTEK and SWLGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTEK has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to SWLGX (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTEK and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer