GTBP vs. NFLY
GTBP (GT Biopharma, Inc.) is a stock, while NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, GTBP returned -83.78% vs -32.79% for NFLY. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GTBP vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTBP achieves a -62.62% return, which is significantly lower than NFLY's -19.50% return.
GTBP
- 1D
- -4.65%
- 1M
- -37.79%
- 6M
- -55.54%
- YTD
- -62.62%
- 1Y
- -83.78%
- 3Y*
- -66.58%
- 5Y*
- -74.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -64.87%
NFLY
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- 6M
- -13.08%
- YTD
- -19.50%
- 1Y
- -32.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $157.31K | $304.34K | $640.92K | |
| $416.46K | $523.86K | $744.62K |
GTBP vs. NFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GTBP GT Biopharma, Inc. | -62.62% | -74.26% | -60.13% | -8.93% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -19.50% | 1.66% | 66.37% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTBP and NFLY is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTBP vs. NFLY — Risk / Return Rank
GTBP
NFLY
GTBP vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GT Biopharma, Inc. (GTBP) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTBP | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.80 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.47 | +0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTBP vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTBP drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTBP and NFLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTBP | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -43.49% | -56.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.14% | -40.74% | -44.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -40.22% | -59.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.60% | -10.05% | -82.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.81% | 22.25% | +45.56% |
Volatility
GTBP vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison
GT Biopharma, Inc. (GTBP) has a higher volatility of 21.25% compared to YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) at 8.42%. This indicates that GTBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTBP | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.25% | 8.42% | +12.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.83% | 22.71% | +55.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 125.85% | 28.74% | +97.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.47% | 28.38% | +93.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.54% | 28.38% | +99.16% |
Dividends
GTBP vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison
GTBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GTBP GT Biopharma, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 64.16% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTBP and NFLY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTBP has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to NFLY (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTBP dropped -99.99% vs NFLY's -43.49%.
GTBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTBP and NFLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer