GT vs. QQQ
GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, GT returned -12.10%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -20.66% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -12.10%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.
GT
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- 6M
- -26.14%
- YTD
- -20.66%
- 1Y
- -31.12%
- 3Y*
- -24.27%
- 5Y*
- -15.05%
- 10Y*
- -12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.41%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.08M | $73.99M | $64.15M | |
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B |
GT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -20.66% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.05% | -20.86% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GT and QQQ is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GT and QQQ has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GT
QQQ
GT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 1.88 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 6.00 | -7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -82.97% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.06% | -11.96% | -35.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.80% | -22.77% | -40.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.88% | -35.12% | -41.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.55% | -35.12% | -51.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.76% | -7.69% | -80.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.80% | -32.62% | -16.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.48% | 3.74% | +24.74% |
Volatility
GT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that GT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.95% | 6.87% | +8.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.26% | 16.08% | +20.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.47% | 19.38% | +28.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.38% | 22.90% | +28.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.06% | 22.50% | +26.56% |
Dividends
GT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GT has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GT dropped -94.50% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer