GT vs. PSEC
GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) and PSEC (Prospect Capital Corporation) are both stocks. GT operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while PSEC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GT returned -13.51%/yr vs -0.06%/yr for PSEC. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GT vs. PSEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -33.79% return, which is significantly lower than PSEC's -5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed PSEC with an annualized return of -13.51%, while PSEC has yielded a comparatively higher -0.06% annualized return.
GT
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -15.45%
- YTD
- -33.79%
- 6M
- -33.87%
- 1Y
- -48.72%
- 3Y*
- -24.43%
- 5Y*
- -22.29%
- 10Y*
- -13.51%
PSEC
- 1D
- -6.61%
- 1M
- -15.64%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -5.64%
- 1Y
- -15.41%
- 3Y*
- -17.37%
- 5Y*
- -13.64%
- 10Y*
- -0.06%
GT vs. PSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -33.79% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.02% | -20.89% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
PSEC Prospect Capital Corporation | -5.36% | -28.86% | -18.16% | -4.13% | -8.61% | 70.00% | -3.54% | 13.83% | 4.09% | -9.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GT and PSEC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2004 | 0.37 |
The correlation between GT and PSEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GT:
-$9.60
PSEC:
-$0.28
GT:
0.07
PSEC:
5.09
GT:
$17.91B
PSEC:
$151.90M
GT:
$2.63B
PSEC:
-$59.07M
GT:
$832.00M
PSEC:
-$94.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GT vs. PSEC — Risk / Return Rank
GT
PSEC
GT vs. PSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GT | PSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.94 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.57 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -1.06 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GT | PSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | -0.46 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | -0.49 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 | -0.00 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.08 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
GT vs. PSEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than PSEC's maximum drawdown of -61.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and PSEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GT | PSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -61.51% | -32.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.27% | -27.04% | -26.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.34% | -50.64% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.88% | -57.21% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.55% | -57.21% | -29.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.79% | -54.34% | -35.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.70% | -15.60% | -33.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.43% | 14.57% | +17.86% |
Volatility
GT vs. PSEC - Volatility Comparison
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC) have volatilities of 14.86% and 15.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GT | PSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.86% | 15.55% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.48% | 27.33% | +5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.64% | 33.80% | +12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.03% | 28.07% | +22.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.79% | 27.36% | +21.43% |
Dividends
GT vs. PSEC - Dividend Comparison
GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
PSEC Prospect Capital Corporation | 23.45% | 20.85% | 16.01% | 12.02% | 10.30% | 8.56% | 13.31% | 11.18% | 11.41% | 13.45% | 11.98% | 14.72% |
Financials
GT vs. PSEC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Prospect Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GT vs. PSEC - Profitability Comparison
GT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PSEC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prospect Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 123.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PSEC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prospect Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 123.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.
PSEC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prospect Capital Corporation reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 123.07M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GT and PSEC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSEC has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to GT (14.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GT dropped -94.50% vs PSEC's -61.51%.
PSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GT and PSEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer