PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GT vs. PIRC.MI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GTPIRC.MI
YTD Return-13.83%23.65%
1Y Return13.00%34.36%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.41%12.22%
5Y Return (Ann)-7.07%3.29%
Sharpe Ratio0.301.40
Daily Std Dev46.47%21.88%
Max Drawdown-94.50%-60.30%
Current Drawdown-78.27%-8.42%

Fundamentals


GTPIRC.MI
Market Cap$3.36B€5.98B
EPS-$2.42€0.48
PE Ratio33.3312.46
Revenue (TTM)$20.07B€6.91B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.88B€6.62B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.50B€1.27B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GT and PIRC.MI is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GT vs. PIRC.MI - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -13.83% return, which is significantly lower than PIRC.MI's 23.65% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-60.07%
2.57%
GT
PIRC.MI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Pirelli & C SPA

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GT vs. PIRC.MI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GT, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.74
PIRC.MI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at 4.08, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.08

GT vs. PIRC.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GT Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the PIRC.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GT and PIRC.MI.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.33
1.36
GT
PIRC.MI

Dividends

GT vs. PIRC.MI - Dividend Comparison

GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PIRC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%4.11%2.84%1.36%1.00%0.95%0.77%0.21%
PIRC.MI
Pirelli & C SPA
3.58%4.42%4.02%1.31%4.13%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GT vs. PIRC.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than PIRC.MI's maximum drawdown of -60.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and PIRC.MI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-62.92%
-19.74%
GT
PIRC.MI

Volatility

GT vs. PIRC.MI - Volatility Comparison

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI) at 4.72%. This indicates that GT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIRC.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.76%
4.72%
GT
PIRC.MI

Financials

GT vs. PIRC.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Pirelli & C SPA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. GT values in USD, PIRC.MI values in EUR