PortfoliosLab logo
GT vs. MNRO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GT and MNRO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GT vs. MNRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GT:

-0.28

MNRO:

-1.06

Sortino Ratio

GT:

0.00

MNRO:

-1.61

Omega Ratio

GT:

1.00

MNRO:

0.82

Calmar Ratio

GT:

-0.16

MNRO:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

GT:

-0.48

MNRO:

-1.71

Ulcer Index

GT:

28.04%

MNRO:

27.19%

Daily Std Dev

GT:

54.45%

MNRO:

45.77%

Max Drawdown

GT:

-94.50%

MNRO:

-84.13%

Current Drawdown

GT:

-80.64%

MNRO:

-83.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GT:

$3.14B

MNRO:

$391.44M

EPS

GT:

$0.84

MNRO:

$0.64

PE Ratio

GT:

13.06

MNRO:

20.42

PEG Ratio

GT:

1.67

MNRO:

1.06

PS Ratio

GT:

0.17

MNRO:

0.32

PB Ratio

GT:

0.64

MNRO:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

GT:

$18.59B

MNRO:

$900.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GT:

$3.62B

MNRO:

$320.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

GT:

$1.86B

MNRO:

$88.98M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a 21.89% return, which is significantly higher than MNRO's -46.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has outperformed MNRO with an annualized return of -8.95%, while MNRO has yielded a comparatively lower -12.81% annualized return.


GT

YTD

21.89%

1M

13.44%

6M

12.28%

1Y

-15.35%

5Y*

12.36%

10Y*

-8.95%

MNRO

YTD

-46.49%

1M

-12.10%

6M

-54.99%

1Y

-48.37%

5Y*

-21.59%

10Y*

-12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GT vs. MNRO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GT is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GT is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GT is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GT is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GT is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GT is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MNRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNRO is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNRO is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNRO is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNRO is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNRO is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNRO is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GT vs. MNRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GT Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is higher than the MNRO Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GT and MNRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GT vs. MNRO - Dividend Comparison

GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.57%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%4.11%2.84%1.36%1.00%0.95%0.77%
MNRO
Monro, Inc.
8.57%4.52%3.82%2.43%1.68%1.65%1.10%1.13%1.25%1.15%0.88%0.87%

Drawdowns

GT vs. MNRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than MNRO's maximum drawdown of -84.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and MNRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GT vs. MNRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is 10.11%, while Monro, Inc. (MNRO) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that GT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GT vs. MNRO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Monro, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
4.25B
305.77M
(GT) Total Revenue
(MNRO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GT vs. MNRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Monro, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
17.4%
34.3%
(GT) Gross Margin
(MNRO) Gross Margin
GT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 740.00M and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

MNRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 104.80M and revenue of 305.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

GT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 90.00M and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

MNRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monro, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.96M and revenue of 305.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

GT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

MNRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Monro, Inc. reported a net income of 4.58M and revenue of 305.77M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.