GT vs. MNRO
Compare and contrast key facts about The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GT or MNRO.
Correlation
The correlation between GT and MNRO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GT vs. MNRO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GT:
-0.89
MNRO:
-0.39
GT:
-1.18
MNRO:
-0.33
GT:
0.85
MNRO:
0.96
GT:
-0.47
MNRO:
-0.22
GT:
-1.41
MNRO:
-0.92
GT:
28.52%
MNRO:
17.23%
GT:
45.17%
MNRO:
41.29%
GT:
-94.50%
MNRO:
-73.52%
GT:
-84.79%
MNRO:
-67.82%
Fundamentals
GT:
$2.63B
MNRO:
$770.90M
GT:
-$1.04
MNRO:
$0.87
GT:
1.67
MNRO:
1.67
GT:
$19.05B
MNRO:
$1.22B
GT:
$3.76B
MNRO:
$438.30M
GT:
$1.30B
MNRO:
$129.19M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -39.80% return, which is significantly lower than MNRO's -10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed MNRO with an annualized return of -10.27%, while MNRO has yielded a comparatively higher -6.28% annualized return.
GT
-39.80%
-4.96%
-23.58%
-41.32%
-10.49%
-10.27%
MNRO
-10.71%
-5.08%
11.11%
-16.01%
-18.74%
-6.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GT vs. MNRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GT vs. MNRO - Dividend Comparison
GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.95% | 0.77% | 0.21% |
MNRO Monro, Inc. | 4.45% | 3.82% | 2.43% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.88% | 0.87% | 0.59% |
Drawdowns
GT vs. MNRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than MNRO's maximum drawdown of -73.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and MNRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GT vs. MNRO - Volatility Comparison
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to Monro, Inc. (MNRO) at 8.92%. This indicates that GT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GT vs. MNRO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Monro, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities