GT vs. MNRO
Compare and contrast key facts about The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO).
Performance
GT vs. MNRO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GT vs. MNRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -24.32% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.02% | -20.89% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
MNRO Monro, Inc. | -18.96% | -13.81% | -11.99% | -33.10% | -20.59% | 11.13% | -30.65% | 15.00% | 22.21% | 0.97% |
Fundamentals
GT:
$2.39M
MNRO:
$503.70M
GT:
-$8.93
MNRO:
-$0.41
GT:
0.07
MNRO:
0.42
GT:
0.00
MNRO:
0.83
GT:
$18.28B
MNRO:
$1.18B
GT:
$3.37B
MNRO:
$409.67M
GT:
$1.70B
MNRO:
$64.80M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -24.32% return, which is significantly lower than MNRO's -18.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed MNRO with an annualized return of -13.90%, while MNRO has yielded a comparatively higher -11.71% annualized return.
GT
- 1D
- 5.41%
- 1M
- -19.64%
- YTD
- -24.32%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- -28.25%
- 3Y*
- -15.58%
- 5Y*
- -17.51%
- 10Y*
- -13.90%
MNRO
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -25.50%
- YTD
- -18.96%
- 6M
- -8.26%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- -27.95%
- 5Y*
- -21.54%
- 10Y*
- -11.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GT vs. MNRO — Risk / Return Rank
GT
MNRO
GT vs. MNRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GT | MNRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 0.27 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | 0.90 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.12 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 0.20 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 0.58 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GT | MNRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 0.27 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | -0.48 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.29 | -0.28 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.11 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between GT and MNRO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GT vs. MNRO - Dividend Comparison
GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
MNRO Monro, Inc. | 6.98% | 5.59% | 4.52% | 3.82% | 2.43% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
GT vs. MNRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than MNRO's maximum drawdown of -84.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and MNRO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GT | MNRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -84.13% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.49% | -36.17% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.52% | -80.66% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.55% | -84.13% | -2.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.33% | -77.84% | -10.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.57% | -25.94% | -22.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.35% | 12.32% | +14.03% |
Volatility
GT vs. MNRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is 13.09%, while Monro, Inc. (MNRO) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that GT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GT | MNRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 16.19% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.32% | 38.40% | -6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.39% | 66.25% | -14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.84% | 44.64% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.58% | 41.74% | +6.84% |
Financials
GT vs. MNRO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Monro, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GT vs. MNRO - Profitability Comparison
GT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 4.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.
MNRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.37M and revenue of 293.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.
GT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 416.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.
MNRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monro, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.57M and revenue of 293.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.
GT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of 105.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
MNRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a net income of 11.14M and revenue of 293.39M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.