GT vs. MNRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) and MNRO (Monro, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Parts industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, GT returned -13.51%/yr vs -10.46%/yr for MNRO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GT vs. MNRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -33.79% return, which is significantly lower than MNRO's -19.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed MNRO with an annualized return of -13.51%, while MNRO has yielded a comparatively higher -10.46% annualized return.

GT

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -15.45%
• YTD: -33.79%
• 6M: -33.87%
• 1Y: -48.72%
• 3Y*: -24.43%
• 5Y*: -22.29%
• 10Y*: -13.51%

MNRO

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -2.98%
• YTD: -19.91%
• 6M: -15.52%
• 1Y: 2.53%
• 3Y*: -24.67%
• 5Y*: -21.08%
• 10Y*: -10.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GT vs. MNRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company	-33.79%	-2.67%	-37.15%	41.08%	-52.39%	95.42%	-29.02%	-20.89%	-35.38%	6.07%
MNRO Monro, Inc.	-19.91%	-13.81%	-11.99%	-33.10%	-20.59%	11.13%	-30.65%	15.00%	22.21%	0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GT and MNRO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1991	0.27

Over the past year, GT and MNRO have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS GT : -$9.60 MNRO : -$0.41
PS Ratio GT : 0.07 MNRO : 0.41
Total Revenue (TTM) GT : $17.91B MNRO : $1.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) GT : $2.63B MNRO : $409.67M
EBITDA (TTM) GT : $832.00M MNRO : $64.80M

Return for Risk

GT vs. MNRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GT

GT Risk / Return Rank: 5
GT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
GT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MNRO

MNRO Risk / Return Rank: 42
MNRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
MNRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MNRO Omega Ratio Rank: 41
MNRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MNRO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GT vs. MNRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GT	MNRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	0.04	-1.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.58	0.47	-2.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.06	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	0.07	-0.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.50	0.15	-1.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GT vs. MNRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GT Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the MNRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GT and MNRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GT	MNRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.05	0.04	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	-0.47	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28	-0.25	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.11	-0.13

Drawdowns

GT vs. MNRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than MNRO's maximum drawdown of -84.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and MNRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GT	MNRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.50%	-84.13%	-10.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.27%	-36.17%	-17.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.34%	-70.01%	+4.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.88%	-78.69%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.55%	-84.13%	-2.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.79%	-78.10%	-11.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.70%	-26.19%	-22.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.43%	16.71%	+15.72%

Volatility

GT vs. MNRO - Volatility Comparison

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO) have volatilities of 14.86% and 14.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GT	MNRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.86%	14.27%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.48%	32.74%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.64%	56.86%	-10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.03%	45.16%	+5.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.79%	42.05%	+6.74%

Dividends

GT vs. MNRO - Dividend Comparison

GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.47%	4.11%	2.84%	1.36%	1.00%	0.77%
MNRO Monro, Inc.	7.19%	5.59%	4.52%	3.82%	2.43%	1.68%	1.65%	1.10%	1.13%	1.25%	1.15%	0.88%

Financials

GT vs. MNRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Monro, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MNRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.37M and revenue of 293.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.

GT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MNRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monro, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.57M and revenue of 293.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

GT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.

MNRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monro, Inc. reported a net income of 11.14M and revenue of 293.39M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GT and MNRO in my portfolio?

GT and MNRO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GT or MNRO?

GT has higher volatility (14.86%) compared to MNRO (14.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GT dropped -94.50% vs MNRO's -84.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.