GT vs. BRDCY
GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) and BRDCY (Bridgestone Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Parts industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, GT returned -13.51%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for BRDCY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GT vs. BRDCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -33.79% return, which is significantly lower than BRDCY's -3.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed BRDCY with an annualized return of -13.51%, while BRDCY has yielded a comparatively higher 3.53% annualized return.
GT
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -15.45%
- YTD
- -33.79%
- 6M
- -33.87%
- 1Y
- -48.72%
- 3Y*
- -24.43%
- 5Y*
- -22.29%
- 10Y*
- -13.51%
BRDCY
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- -3.79%
- 6M
- -8.76%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.53%
GT vs. BRDCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -33.79% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.02% | -20.89% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
BRDCY Bridgestone Corporation | -3.79% | 36.08% | -16.65% | 18.44% | -17.81% | 30.79% | -11.30% | -3.65% | -17.43% | 28.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GT and BRDCY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
GT:
-$9.60
BRDCY:
$132.61
GT:
0.07
BRDCY:
0.01
GT:
$17.91B
BRDCY:
$4.55T
GT:
$2.63B
BRDCY:
$1.76T
GT:
$832.00M
BRDCY:
$825.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GT vs. BRDCY — Risk / Return Rank
GT
BRDCY
GT vs. BRDCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GT | BRDCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.07 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 0.32 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 0.70 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GT | BRDCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 0.27 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.00 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 | 0.16 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.15 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
GT vs. BRDCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than BRDCY's maximum drawdown of -45.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and BRDCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GT | BRDCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -45.83% | -48.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.27% | -20.16% | -33.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.34% | -25.47% | -39.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.88% | -34.15% | -42.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.55% | -45.83% | -40.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.79% | -14.10% | -75.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.70% | -17.51% | -31.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.43% | 9.02% | +23.41% |
Volatility
GT vs. BRDCY - Volatility Comparison
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a higher volatility of 14.86% compared to Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) at 6.11%. This indicates that GT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRDCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GT | BRDCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.86% | 6.11% | +8.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.48% | 18.11% | +14.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.64% | 23.37% | +23.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.03% | 22.80% | +28.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.79% | 22.95% | +25.84% |
Dividends
GT vs. BRDCY - Dividend Comparison
GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRDCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRDCY Bridgestone Corporation | 1.79% | 1.72% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.62% | 0.00% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
Financials
GT vs. BRDCY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Bridgestone Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GT vs. BRDCY - Profitability Comparison
GT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BRDCY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bridgestone Corporation reported a gross profit of 440.73B and revenue of 1.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.
GT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BRDCY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bridgestone Corporation reported an operating income of 124.62B and revenue of 1.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
GT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.
BRDCY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bridgestone Corporation reported a net income of 93.80B and revenue of 1.13T, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GT and BRDCY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GT has higher volatility (14.86%) compared to BRDCY (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GT dropped -94.50% vs BRDCY's -45.83%.
BRDCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GT and BRDCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer