PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GT vs. AB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

GT vs. AB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GT vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
-24.32%-2.67%-37.15%41.08%-52.39%95.42%-29.02%-20.89%-35.38%6.07%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
-0.36%13.36%30.40%-2.29%-23.46%56.27%23.00%19.85%21.04%16.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GT:

$2.39M

AB:

$3.39B

EPS

GT:

-$8.93

AB:

$2.89

PS Ratio

GT:

0.07

AB:

11.69

PB Ratio

GT:

0.00

AB:

2.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

GT:

$18.28B

AB:

$332.76M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GT:

$3.37B

AB:

$332.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

GT:

$1.70B

AB:

$243.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -24.32% return, which is significantly lower than AB's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed AB with an annualized return of -13.90%, while AB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.83% annualized return.


GT

1D
5.41%
1M
-19.64%
YTD
-24.32%
6M
-11.36%
1Y
-28.25%
3Y*
-15.58%
5Y*
-17.51%
10Y*
-13.90%

AB

1D
2.69%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
2.51%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
13.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GT vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GT
GT Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AB
AB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GT vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTABDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.55

0.24

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.56

0.54

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.07

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

0.40

-0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.93

0.99

-1.92

GT vs. AB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GT Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the AB Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GT and AB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

0.24

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

0.24

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.29

0.43

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.46

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between GT and AB is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GT vs. AB - Dividend Comparison

GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.03%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%4.11%2.84%1.36%1.00%0.77%
AB
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
9.03%9.02%8.03%8.44%10.30%7.33%8.26%7.67%10.54%8.50%7.46%8.09%

Drawdowns

GT vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than AB's maximum drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and AB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GTABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.50%

-87.65%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.49%

-15.41%

-33.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.52%

-45.76%

-28.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.55%

-58.08%

-28.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.33%

-10.42%

-77.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.57%

-26.30%

-22.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.35%

6.17%

+20.18%

Volatility

GT vs. AB - Volatility Comparison

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 7.70%. This indicates that GT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GTABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.09%

7.70%

+5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.32%

18.83%

+13.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.39%

26.61%

+24.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.84%

28.50%

+22.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.58%

32.46%

+16.12%

Financials

GT vs. AB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
4.92B
89.76M
(GT) Total Revenue
(AB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GT vs. AB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
20.9%
100.0%
Portfolio components
GT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 4.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

AB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a gross profit of 89.76M and revenue of 89.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

GT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 416.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.

AB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported an operating income of 89.76M and revenue of 89.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

GT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of 105.00M and revenue of 4.92B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

AB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a net income of 81.80M and revenue of 89.76M, resulting in a net margin of 91.1%.