GT vs. AB
GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) and AB (AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.) are both stocks. GT operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while AB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GT returned -12.10%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for AB. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GT vs. AB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GT achieves a -20.66% return, which is significantly lower than AB's -0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GT has underperformed AB with an annualized return of -12.10%, while AB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.
GT
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- 6M
- -26.14%
- YTD
- -20.66%
- 1Y
- -31.12%
- 3Y*
- -24.27%
- 5Y*
- -15.05%
- 10Y*
- -12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.41%
AB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- -1.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.20M | $8.80M | $11.34M | |
| $55.08M | $73.99M | $64.15M |
GT vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | -20.66% | -2.67% | -37.15% | 41.08% | -52.39% | 95.42% | -29.05% | -20.86% | -35.38% | 6.07% |
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | -0.09% | 13.36% | 30.40% | -2.29% | -23.46% | 56.27% | 23.00% | 19.85% | 21.04% | 16.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GT and AB is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 1988 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GT and AB has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GT:
$2.00B
AB:
$3.43B
GT:
-$10.82
AB:
$3.39
GT:
0.07
AB:
9.88
GT:
$17.91B
AB:
$343.43M
GT:
$2.63B
AB:
$343.43M
GT:
$832.00M
AB:
$343.43M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GT vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank
GT
AB
GT vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GT | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.00 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.13 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -0.25 | -0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GT vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GT drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than AB's maximum drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GT and AB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GT | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -87.65% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.06% | -14.68% | -32.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.80% | -19.00% | -43.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.88% | -45.76% | -31.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.55% | -58.08% | -28.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.76% | -10.17% | -77.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.80% | -26.15% | -22.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.48% | 7.31% | +21.17% |
Volatility
GT vs. AB - Volatility Comparison
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 4.49%. This indicates that GT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GT | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.95% | 4.49% | +10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.26% | 16.00% | +20.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.47% | 22.25% | +25.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.38% | 28.06% | +23.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.06% | 32.31% | +16.75% |
Dividends
GT vs. AB - Dividend Comparison
GT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 9.28% | 9.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% |
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 2.84% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.77% |
Financials
GT vs. AB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GT vs. AB - Profitability Comparison
GT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a gross profit of 80.00M and revenue of 80.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
GT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported an operating income of 80.00M and revenue of 80.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.
GT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.
AB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. reported a net income of 71.72M and revenue of 80.00M, resulting in a net margin of 89.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GT and AB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GT has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to AB (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GT dropped -94.50% vs AB's -87.65%.
AB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GT and AB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer