PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPKX vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPKX achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSPKX having a 12.77% annualized return and DGRO not far ahead at 13.38%.


GSPKX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.50%
6M
8.87%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
12.77%
ALL TIME*
9.75%

DGRO

1D
0.35%
1M
1.32%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.38%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.57M$103.25M$110.55M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
11.03%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.79%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPKX and DGRO is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between GSPKX and DGRO has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPKX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSPKXDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.83

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.36

14.91

-2.55

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPKX and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPKX drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPKX and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPKXDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-35.10%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-6.47%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-14.03%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.34%

-19.31%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-35.10%

+2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.01%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.41%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.66%

-0.06%

Volatility

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPKXDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.88%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

7.12%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.55%

9.54%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

13.79%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

16.58%

+0.30%

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSPKX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

GSPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, more than DGRO's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
5.96%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSPKX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to GSPKX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPKX dropped -51.90% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPKX and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer