GSM vs. PALL

In the year-to-date period, GSM achieves a -18.14% return, which is significantly lower than PALL's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GSM has underperformed PALL with an annualized return of -16.56%, while PALL has yielded a comparatively higher 0.97% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GSM Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the PALL Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSM and PALL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GSM drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than PALL's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSM and PALL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) at 6.36%. This indicates that GSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.