GSM vs. PALL
Compare and contrast key facts about Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL).
PALL is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSM or PALL.
Correlation
The correlation between GSM and PALL is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GSM vs. PALL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSM:
-0.97
PALL:
-0.62
GSM:
-1.41
PALL:
-0.78
GSM:
0.84
PALL:
0.92
GSM:
-0.46
PALL:
-0.32
GSM:
-1.39
PALL:
-1.19
GSM:
27.37%
PALL:
19.69%
GSM:
39.25%
PALL:
37.50%
GSM:
-98.29%
PALL:
-73.63%
GSM:
-82.02%
PALL:
-71.45%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSM achieves a -40.06% return, which is significantly lower than PALL's -16.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GSM has underperformed PALL with an annualized return of -12.47%, while PALL has yielded a comparatively higher 0.66% annualized return.
GSM
-40.06%
-13.62%
-25.06%
-40.25%
33.85%
-12.47%
PALL
-16.70%
-9.82%
-3.76%
-24.78%
-13.51%
0.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSM vs. PALL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSM vs. PALL - Dividend Comparison
GSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferroglobe PLC | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.55% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 2.98% | 1.74% | 1.47% |
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSM vs. PALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSM drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than PALL's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSM and PALL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSM vs. PALL - Volatility Comparison
Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) at 6.74%. This indicates that GSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.