GSLC vs. TIP
GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSLC returned 14.72%/yr vs 2.59%/yr for TIP. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSLC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TIP.
Performance
GSLC vs. TIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GSLC has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 14.72%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.
GSLC
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 24.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
TIP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.59%
GSLC vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.23% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 27.17% | 19.02% | 30.74% | -4.07% | 22.49% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.73% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSLC and TIP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015 | 0.06 |
The correlation between GSLC and TIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSLC vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank
GSLC
TIP
GSLC vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSLC | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.15 | 1.49 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 2.29 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.38 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 7.17 | +4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSLC | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.49 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.18 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.45 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.57 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
GSLC vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and TIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSLC | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -14.57% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -1.98% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -4.54% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | -14.51% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -14.51% | -19.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -3.43% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 0.66% | +1.47% |
Volatility
GSLC vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 0.89%. This indicates that GSLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSLC | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 0.89% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 2.32% | +6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 3.43% | +8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 6.21% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 5.74% | +11.94% |
GSLC vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TIP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSLC vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison
GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than TIP's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.92% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.75% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSLC and TIP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSLC has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to TIP (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs TIP's -14.57%.
On 10-year performance, GSLC leads with 14.72% vs 2.59% for TIP. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GSLC has performed better with a 14.72% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TIP.
TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.92% for GSLC.
GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while TIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.19% for TIP.
GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSLC and TIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer