GSLC vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSLC returned 14.72%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSLC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

GSLC vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GSLC has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 14.72%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.94% annualized return.

GSLC

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 9.80%
• 1Y: 24.99%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

ACWI

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 30.55%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	9.23%	16.17%	24.21%	25.09%	-18.71%	27.17%	19.02%	30.74%	-4.07%	22.49%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	13.06%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and ACWI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015	0.94

The correlation between GSLC and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSLC vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSLC	ACWI
Technology	38.0%	29.4%
Financial Services	10.6%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.3%
Communication Services	10.5%	9.0%
Healthcare	8.3%	8.1%
Industrials	8.2%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	5.0%
Energy	3.2%	4.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.6%
Basic Materials	1.5%	3.7%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

GSLC vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC

GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 62
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 71
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSLC	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.41	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	3.31	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.44	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.24	-0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	14.58	-2.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSLC vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSLC	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.41	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.73	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.76	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.43	+0.39

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSLC	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.69%	-56.00%	+22.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.49%	-9.73%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.66%	-16.55%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.90%	-26.42%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.69%	-33.53%	-0.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-8.61%	+4.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.16%	-0.03%

Volatility

GSLC vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is 2.65%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that GSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSLC	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	3.88%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	10.27%	-1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.70%	12.77%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.62%	16.05%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	17.11%	+0.57%

GSLC vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSLC vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ACWI's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.37%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.92%	1.00%	1.11%	1.38%	1.61%	1.06%	1.35%	1.54%	1.89%	1.69%	1.69%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSLC and ACWI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, GSLC and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSLC or ACWI?

ACWI has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to GSLC (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, GSLC or ACWI?

On 10-year performance, GSLC leads with 14.72% vs 12.94% for ACWI. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSLC or ACWI?

Over the 10-year period, GSLC has performed better with a 14.72% return vs 12.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSLC or ACWI?

GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSLC or ACWI?

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.92% for GSLC.

What is the main difference between GSLC and ACWI?

GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.