GSID vs. SCHF
GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GSID tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.97%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for SCHF. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSID charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
GSID vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return.
GSID
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
GSID vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 10.66% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.68% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSID and SCHF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSID and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSID vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSID
SCHF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
GSID
SCHF
Industrials
GSID
SCHF
Technology
GSID
SCHF
Healthcare
GSID
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
GSID
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
GSID
SCHF
Basic Materials
GSID
SCHF
Communication Services
GSID
SCHF
Energy
GSID
SCHF
Utilities
GSID
SCHF
Real Estate
GSID
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSID vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
GSID
SCHF
GSID vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSID | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.18 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 12.22 | -3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSID vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSID | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -34.87% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -11.48% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -13.41% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -29.14% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -7.36% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.98% | +0.07% |
Volatility
GSID vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is 4.79%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that GSID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSID | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 6.42% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 14.43% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 16.63% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.55% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 17.21% | -0.88% |
GSID vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSID vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.90% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, GSID and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to GSID (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 5-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.67% vs 8.97% for GSID. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, GSID has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.67% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSID.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.39% for GSID.
GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSID and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer