PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSID vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSID vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 17.68% return.


GSID

1D
0.05%
1M
2.03%
YTD
10.66%
6M
11.20%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*

SCHF

1D
0.21%
1M
3.82%
YTD
17.68%
6M
18.27%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSID vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSID
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
10.66%31.77%3.60%17.63%-14.77%10.67%35.83%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
17.68%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GSID and SCHF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.98

The correlation between GSID and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSID vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSID
SCHF

Financial Services

24.2%
23.3%

Industrials

19.4%
18.1%

Technology

11.4%
17.6%

Healthcare

10.2%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
5.7%

Basic Materials

6.2%
7.4%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.6%

Energy

3.8%
4.7%

Utilities

3.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.0%

Financial Services

GSID
24.2%
SCHF
23.3%

Industrials

GSID
19.4%
SCHF
18.1%

Technology

GSID
11.4%
SCHF
17.6%

Healthcare

GSID
10.2%
SCHF
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GSID
7.9%
SCHF
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

GSID
6.6%
SCHF
5.7%

Basic Materials

GSID
6.2%
SCHF
7.4%

Communication Services

GSID
4.7%
SCHF
3.6%

Energy

GSID
3.8%
SCHF
4.7%

Utilities

GSID
3.7%
SCHF
3.2%

Real Estate

GSID
2.1%
SCHF
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSID vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSID
GSID Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSID Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GSID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSID Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSID vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIDSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.18

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

12.22

-3.72

GSID vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSID Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSID and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSID vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIDSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-34.87%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-11.48%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.96%

-13.41%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-29.14%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-7.36%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.98%

+0.07%

Volatility

GSID vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is 4.79%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that GSID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIDSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

6.42%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

14.43%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

16.63%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

16.55%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

17.21%

-0.88%

GSID vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSID has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSID vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than SCHF's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSID
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
2.39%2.64%2.90%2.59%2.57%2.93%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.90%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GSID and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to GSID (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 5-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.67% vs 8.97% for GSID. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, GSID has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.67% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSID.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.39% for GSID.

GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSID and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSID and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer