GSID vs. LKQ
GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while LKQ (LKQ Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.35%/yr vs -9.91%/yr for LKQ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GSID vs. LKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than LKQ's -12.96% return.
GSID
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
LKQ
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -12.35%
- 1Y
- -28.24%
- 3Y*
- -19.59%
- 5Y*
- -9.91%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
GSID vs. LKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 8.62% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
LKQ LKQ Corporation | -12.96% | -14.99% | -20.92% | -8.56% | -9.24% | 71.09% | 49.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSID and LKQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between GSID and LKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSID vs. LKQ — Risk / Return Rank
GSID
LKQ
GSID vs. LKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSID | LKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.87 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | -0.80 | +2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.43 | -1.35 | +8.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSID vs. LKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum LKQ drawdown of -68.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and LKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSID | LKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -68.02% | +38.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -35.54% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -54.80% | +40.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -54.80% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -52.05% | +50.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -16.06% | +10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 20.96% | -17.91% |
Volatility
GSID vs. LKQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is 5.15%, while LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that GSID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSID | LKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 8.17% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 24.00% | -10.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 35.75% | -20.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 30.00% | -13.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 33.76% | -17.42% |
Dividends
GSID vs. LKQ - Dividend Comparison
GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than LKQ's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.44% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% |
LKQ LKQ Corporation | 4.66% | 3.97% | 3.27% | 2.35% | 1.92% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSID and LKQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LKQ has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to GSID (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs LKQ's -68.02%.
GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSID and LKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer