GSID vs. LKQ
GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index, while LKQ (LKQ Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GSID returned 8.59%/yr vs -10.64%/yr for LKQ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GSID vs. LKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSID achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than LKQ's -14.04% return.
GSID
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
LKQ
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -21.81%
- YTD
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -31.41%
- 3Y*
- -21.69%
- 5Y*
- -10.64%
- 10Y*
- -1.34%
GSID vs. LKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 9.63% | 31.77% | 3.60% | 17.63% | -14.77% | 10.67% | 35.83% |
LKQ LKQ Corporation | -14.04% | -14.99% | -20.92% | -8.56% | -9.24% | 71.09% | 49.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSID and LKQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between GSID and LKQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSID vs. LKQ — Risk / Return Rank
GSID
LKQ
GSID vs. LKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSID | LKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.85 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | -0.91 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | -1.50 | +8.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSID vs. LKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSID drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum LKQ drawdown of -68.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSID and LKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSID | LKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -68.02% | +38.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -34.54% | +23.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -54.50% | +40.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -54.80% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -52.64% | +50.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -16.14% | +10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 20.96% | -17.91% |
Volatility
GSID vs. LKQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is 4.52%, while LKQ Corporation (LKQ) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that GSID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSID | LKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 9.61% | -5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 23.75% | -10.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 36.17% | -20.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 30.04% | -13.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 33.73% | -17.42% |
Dividends
GSID vs. LKQ - Dividend Comparison
GSID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than LKQ's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF | 2.49% | 2.64% | 2.90% | 2.59% | 2.57% | 2.93% | 1.02% |
LKQ LKQ Corporation | 4.72% | 3.97% | 3.27% | 2.35% | 1.92% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSID and LKQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LKQ has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to GSID (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSID dropped -29.89% vs LKQ's -68.02%.
GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSID and LKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer