GSHD vs. MET
GSHD (Goosehead Insurance, Inc) and MET (MetLife, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — GSHD in Insurance - Diversified, MET in Insurance - Life. Over the past 5 years, GSHD returned -16.92%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for MET. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GSHD vs. MET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSHD achieves a -53.33% return, which is significantly lower than MET's 4.08% return.
GSHD
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -21.15%
- YTD
- -53.33%
- 6M
- -54.72%
- 1Y
- -68.93%
- 3Y*
- -14.51%
- 5Y*
- -16.92%
- 10Y*
- —
MET
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
GSHD vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSHD Goosehead Insurance, Inc | -53.33% | -27.42% | 41.45% | 120.73% | -73.60% | 5.69% | 198.65% | 63.99% | 66.92% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 4.08% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -12.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSHD and MET is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
GSHD:
$0.81
MET:
$7.21
GSHD:
42.58
MET:
11.24
GSHD:
0.09
MET:
0.37
GSHD:
3.38
MET:
0.53
GSHD:
$382.80M
MET:
$76.95B
GSHD:
$234.63M
MET:
$14.75B
GSHD:
$84.37M
MET:
$4.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSHD vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank
GSHD
MET
GSHD vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goosehead Insurance, Inc (GSHD) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSHD | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.06 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.30 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 0.80 | -2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSHD | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.27 | 0.23 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.28 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.26 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
GSHD vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSHD drawdown since its inception was -83.41%, roughly equal to the maximum MET drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSHD and MET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSHD | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.41% | -82.37% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.37% | -17.46% | -51.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.25% | -21.97% | -50.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.41% | -35.09% | -48.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.52% | -4.20% | -75.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.97% | -17.64% | -21.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.41% | 6.42% | +35.99% |
Volatility
GSHD vs. MET - Volatility Comparison
Goosehead Insurance, Inc (GSHD) has a higher volatility of 20.58% compared to MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 5.98%. This indicates that GSHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSHD | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.58% | 5.98% | +14.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.92% | 17.26% | +27.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.35% | 22.89% | +31.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.61% | 25.69% | +32.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.51% | 30.69% | +28.82% |
Dividends
GSHD vs. MET - Dividend Comparison
GSHD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSHD Goosehead Insurance, Inc | 0.00% | 8.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.83% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
Financials
GSHD vs. MET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goosehead Insurance, Inc and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GSHD vs. MET - Profitability Comparison
GSHD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goosehead Insurance, Inc reported a gross profit of 42.55M and revenue of 93.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GSHD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goosehead Insurance, Inc reported an operating income of 15.00M and revenue of 93.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GSHD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goosehead Insurance, Inc reported a net income of 4.89M and revenue of 93.08M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSHD and MET have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSHD has higher volatility (20.58%) compared to MET (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSHD dropped -83.41% vs MET's -82.37%.
MET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSHD and MET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer