PortfoliosLab logo
GSFP vs. GABF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GSFP and GABF is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

GSFP vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF (GSFP) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSFP:

0.23

GABF:

1.03

Sortino Ratio

GSFP:

0.38

GABF:

1.43

Omega Ratio

GSFP:

1.05

GABF:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

GSFP:

0.09

GABF:

1.13

Martin Ratio

GSFP:

0.60

GABF:

3.82

Ulcer Index

GSFP:

5.00%

GABF:

6.18%

Daily Std Dev

GSFP:

17.33%

GABF:

24.25%

Max Drawdown

GSFP:

-40.50%

GABF:

-20.86%

Current Drawdown

GSFP:

-18.64%

GABF:

-6.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSFP achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -0.67% return.


GSFP

YTD

7.87%

1M

5.73%

6M

1.49%

1Y

3.60%

3Y*

2.89%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GABF

YTD

-0.67%

1M

5.33%

6M

-6.60%

1Y

23.94%

3Y*

23.00%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSFP vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSFP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSFP vs. GABF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSFP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSFP is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSFP is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSFP is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSFP is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSFP is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSFP is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GABF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GABF is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GABF is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GABF is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GABF is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GABF is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GABF is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSFP vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF (GSFP) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GSFP Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSFP and GABF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GSFP vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

GSFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than GABF's 4.22% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
GSFP
Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF
1.01%1.09%3.43%0.82%0.08%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
4.22%4.19%4.95%1.31%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSFP vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSFP drawdown since its inception was -40.50%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSFP and GABF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GSFP vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF (GSFP) is 2.95%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that GSFP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...