GSBFX vs. FMSDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSBFX (Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund) and FMSDX (Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, GSBFX returned 5.59%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for FMSDX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSBFX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FMSDX.

Performance

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund (FMSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSBFX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than FMSDX's 8.45% return.

GSBFX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 5.23%
• 6M: 5.34%
• 1Y: 13.72%
• 3Y*: 10.93%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: 7.02%

FMSDX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 12.99%
• 5Y*: 6.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.23%	10.42%	9.32%	9.64%	-9.53%	10.50%	9.53%	19.38%	-4.83%
FMSDX Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund	8.45%	14.10%	9.95%	11.75%	-13.67%	17.27%	14.56%	23.14%	-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBFX and FMSDX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018	0.83

The correlation between GSBFX and FMSDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSBFX vs. FMSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBFX

GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 73
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FMSDX

FMSDX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FMSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FMSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FMSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FMSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FMSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund (FMSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSBFX	FMSDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.20	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	2.99	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.39	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.36	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.72	11.69	+2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FMSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBFX and FMSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSBFX	FMSDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.20	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.66	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.92	-0.22

Drawdowns

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than FMSDX's maximum drawdown of -21.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and FMSDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSBFX	FMSDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-21.64%	-15.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-6.47%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	-13.17%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.94%	-18.12%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.71%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-3.81%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	1.86%	-0.84%

Volatility

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) is 1.76%, while Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund (FMSDX) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that GSBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSBFX	FMSDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.76%	2.50%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.45%	7.39%	-2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.49%	9.89%	-4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.41%	9.80%	-2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	10.60%	-2.61%

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FMSDX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSBFX vs. FMSDX - Dividend Comparison

GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than FMSDX's 3.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMSDX Fidelity Multi-Asset Income Fund	3.47%	3.81%	3.84%	4.23%	3.74%	2.81%	1.79%	2.82%	4.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund	5.09%	4.39%	5.12%	3.41%	4.10%	6.66%	3.05%	3.52%	3.98%	3.52%	3.78%	3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSBFX and FMSDX in my portfolio?

GSBFX and FMSDX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSBFX or FMSDX?

FMSDX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to GSBFX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs FMSDX's -21.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.