GSBD vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
GSBD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSBD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. | -0.48% | -8.81% | -6.24% | 20.97% | -20.13% | 10.85% | 0.71% | 26.36% | -9.44% | 1.96% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 0.02% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSBD achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, GSBD has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 3.15%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return.
GSBD
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- -5.69%
- 1Y
- -9.32%
- 3Y*
- 0.05%
- 5Y*
- -2.95%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
QYLD
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSBD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GSBD
QYLD
GSBD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSBD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | 1.00 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | 1.61 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.51 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 9.98 | -10.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSBD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 1.00 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.47 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.58 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.55 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSBD and QYLD is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSBD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
GSBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.71%, more than QYLD's 11.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. | 19.71% | 20.26% | 14.88% | 12.29% | 13.12% | 10.18% | 9.41% | 8.46% | 9.79% | 8.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.92% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Drawdowns
GSBD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSBD drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBD and QYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSBD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.67% | -24.75% | -37.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.41% | -10.84% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -24.61% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.67% | -24.75% | -37.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.62% | -2.41% | -22.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -3.89% | -7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 1.64% | +9.71% |
Volatility
GSBD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.90%. This indicates that GSBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSBD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.90% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 7.48% | +5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 16.42% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 14.84% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.76% | 15.51% | +15.25% |