PortfoliosLab logo
GSBD vs. PNNT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GSBD and PNNT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GSBD vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GSBD:

-0.81

PNNT:

0.29

Sortino Ratio

GSBD:

-1.11

PNNT:

0.49

Omega Ratio

GSBD:

0.86

PNNT:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

GSBD:

-0.59

PNNT:

0.34

Martin Ratio

GSBD:

-1.29

PNNT:

0.87

Ulcer Index

GSBD:

13.53%

PNNT:

7.01%

Daily Std Dev

GSBD:

20.13%

PNNT:

24.00%

Max Drawdown

GSBD:

-62.67%

PNNT:

-82.16%

Current Drawdown

GSBD:

-19.30%

PNNT:

-3.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GSBD:

$1.32B

PNNT:

$444.67M

EPS

GSBD:

$0.43

PNNT:

$0.85

PE Ratio

GSBD:

26.26

PNNT:

8.01

PEG Ratio

GSBD:

2.15

PNNT:

0.28

PS Ratio

GSBD:

3.05

PNNT:

3.09

PB Ratio

GSBD:

0.86

PNNT:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSBD:

$353.12M

PNNT:

$291.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSBD:

$219.61M

PNNT:

$66.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

GSBD:

$60.95M

PNNT:

$32.78M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSBD achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly lower than PNNT's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GSBD has underperformed PNNT with an annualized return of 3.91%, while PNNT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.13% annualized return.


GSBD

YTD

-2.84%

1M

6.61%

6M

-4.56%

1Y

-15.67%

5Y*

5.32%

10Y*

3.91%

PNNT

YTD

1.98%

1M

9.01%

6M

5.55%

1Y

5.94%

5Y*

32.46%

10Y*

9.13%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GSBD vs. PNNT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GSBD is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GSBD is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GSBD is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GSBD is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GSBD is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GSBD is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PNNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PNNT is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PNNT is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PNNT is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PNNT is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PNNT is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PNNT is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GSBD vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GSBD Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the PNNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBD and PNNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GSBD vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison

GSBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.21%, more than PNNT's 14.10% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
16.21%14.88%12.29%13.12%10.18%9.41%8.46%9.79%8.12%7.65%9.47%0.00%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
14.10%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%11.75%

Drawdowns

GSBD vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBD drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBD and PNNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GSBD vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) is 6.62%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that GSBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GSBD vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
96.94M
210.41M
(GSBD) Total Revenue
(PNNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items