PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSBD vs. PNNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GSBD vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSBD achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -35.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GSBD has underperformed PNNT with an annualized return of 3.59%, while PNNT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.59% annualized return.


GSBD

1D
1.07%
1M
6.43%
YTD
5.68%
6M
6.12%
1Y
-2.19%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
-2.59%
10Y*
3.59%

PNNT

1D
3.29%
1M
-7.28%
YTD
-35.79%
6M
-33.79%
1Y
-38.27%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
5.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBD vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
5.68%-8.81%-6.24%20.97%-20.13%10.85%0.71%26.36%-9.44%1.96%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
-35.79%-2.96%16.56%37.25%-8.90%61.71%-17.99%14.30%2.05%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBD and PNNT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2015

0.43

The correlation between GSBD and PNNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GSBD:

$0.98

PNNT:

$302.41

PE Ratio

GSBD:

9.63

PNNT:

0.01

PEG Ratio

GSBD:

0.21

PNNT:

0.00

PS Ratio

GSBD:

3.78

PNNT:

1.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSBD:

$286.69M

PNNT:

$85.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSBD:

$141.38M

PNNT:

$24.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

GSBD:

$164.11M

PNNT:

$16.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSBD vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBD
GSBD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GSBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSBD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSBD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PNNT
PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBD vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSBDPNNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.76

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.82

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

-1.77

+1.59

GSBD vs. PNNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBD Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the PNNT Sharpe Ratio of -1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBD and PNNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSBD vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBD drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBD and PNNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSBDPNNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-82.16%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.41%

-47.09%

+28.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.59%

-47.09%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-47.09%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.67%

-69.14%

+6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.95%

-45.35%

+25.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-15.33%

+3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.40%

21.67%

-9.27%

Volatility

GSBD vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) is 6.21%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that GSBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSBDPNNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

10.55%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

24.47%

-7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.56%

27.87%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

23.70%

-4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.03%

32.85%

-1.82%

Dividends

GSBD vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison

GSBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.03%, less than PNNT's 27.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
18.03%20.26%14.88%12.29%13.12%10.18%9.41%8.46%9.79%8.12%7.65%9.47%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
27.83%16.11%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%

Financials

GSBD vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
78.79M
27.25M
(GSBD) Total Revenue
(PNNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GSBD and PNNT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNNT has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to GSBD (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBD dropped -62.67% vs PNNT's -82.16%.

GSBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSBD and PNNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer