GS vs. PCKPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX).

PCKPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008.

Performance

GS vs. PCKPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GS vs. PCKPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	-3.25%	56.64%	52.03%	15.91%	-7.87%	47.61%	17.45%	40.48%	-33.53%	7.73%
PCKPX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund	-3.90%	10.58%	11.55%	15.90%	-23.99%	14.03%	19.39%	26.69%	-12.23%	17.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a -3.25% return, which is significantly higher than PCKPX's -3.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed PCKPX with an annualized return of 20.59%, while PCKPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.

GS

• 1D: 4.75%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 58.07%
• 3Y*: 40.67%
• 5Y*: 23.83%
• 10Y*: 20.59%

PCKPX

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: -3.90%
• 6M: -2.96%
• 1Y: 18.48%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: 9.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GS vs. PCKPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS

GS Risk / Return Rank: 87
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PCKPX

PCKPX Risk / Return Rank: 33
PCKPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PCKPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PCKPX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PCKPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PCKPX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GS vs. PCKPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GS	PCKPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.76	+1.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	1.19	+1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.15	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	0.98	+2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.70	3.66	+6.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GS vs. PCKPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the PCKPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and PCKPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GS	PCKPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	0.76	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.05	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.37	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.39	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between GS and PCKPX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GS vs. PCKPX - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than PCKPX's 4.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	1.83%	1.59%	2.01%	2.72%	2.62%	1.70%	1.90%	1.80%	1.89%	1.14%	1.09%	1.41%
PCKPX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund	4.40%	4.23%	3.52%	1.45%	26.78%	19.38%	5.69%	5.92%	12.87%	5.82%	3.37%	8.93%

Drawdowns

GS vs. PCKPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than PCKPX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and PCKPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GS	PCKPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.84%	-55.77%	-23.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.42%	-14.99%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.84%	-35.71%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.75%	-46.38%	-2.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.85%	-12.25%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.75%	-10.54%	-12.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.08%	4.19%	+1.89%

Volatility

GS vs. PCKPX - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) at 7.20%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCKPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GS	PCKPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.44%	7.20%	+2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.70%	14.90%	+6.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.11%	23.92%	+8.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.68%	23.38%	+4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.71%	24.15%	+5.56%