GS vs. PCKPX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX).
PCKPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GS or PCKPX.
Performance
GS vs. PCKPX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 56.01% return, which is significantly higher than PCKPX's 15.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed PCKPX with an annualized return of 14.27%, while PCKPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.66% annualized return.
GS
56.01%
11.73%
27.77%
78.89%
24.93%
14.27%
PCKPX
15.72%
0.88%
10.24%
31.61%
2.50%
2.66%
Key characteristics
| GS | PCKPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.09 | 1.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.27 | 2.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.57 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.85 | 0.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 31.44 | 8.28 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.55% | 3.82% |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.01% | 21.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -78.84% | -55.55% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.96% | -25.49% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between GS and PCKPX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GS vs. PCKPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GS vs. PCKPX - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than PCKPX's 4.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.91% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
PCKPX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | 4.70% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 18.74% | 5.68% | 3.06% | 2.74% | 3.73% | 3.37% | 2.04% | 4.58% | 6.53% |
Drawdowns
GS vs. PCKPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than PCKPX's maximum drawdown of -55.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and PCKPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GS vs. PCKPX - Volatility Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 14.16% compared to PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PCKPX) at 8.02%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCKPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.