GRPN vs. IR
GRPN (Groupon, Inc.) and IR (Ingersoll-Rand Plc) are both stocks. GRPN operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while IR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, GRPN returned -5.38%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for IR. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GRPN vs. IR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRPN achieves a 56.62% return, which is significantly higher than IR's 5.30% return.
GRPN
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 94.91%
- YTD
- 56.62%
- 1Y
- -5.09%
- 3Y*
- 53.07%
- 5Y*
- -5.38%
- 10Y*
- -12.26%
- ALL TIME*
- -18.48%
IR
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- 6M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 11.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GRPN Groupon, Inc. | $35.71M | $38.89M | $37.92M |
| $385.67M | $344.34M | $322.61M |
GRPN vs. IR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPN Groupon, Inc. | 56.62% | 44.94% | -5.37% | 49.65% | -62.95% | -39.04% | -20.51% | -25.31% | -37.25% | 45.71% |
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc | 5.30% | -12.34% | 17.06% | 48.21% | -15.41% | 35.85% | 24.21% | 92.80% | -39.73% | 59.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRPN and IR is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
GRPN:
$1.05B
IR:
$32.63B
GRPN:
-$2.56
IR:
$3.23
GRPN:
2.24
IR:
3.12
GRPN:
$498.44M
IR:
$7.94B
GRPN:
$443.22M
IR:
$3.01B
GRPN:
$9.20M
IR:
$1.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRPN vs. IR — Risk / Return Rank
GRPN
IR
GRPN vs. IR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRPN | IR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.02 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | -0.05 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | -0.10 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRPN vs. IR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRPN drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than IR's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPN and IR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRPN | IR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.47% | -50.27% | -49.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.87% | -30.56% | -43.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.20% | -36.62% | -37.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.71% | -36.62% | -55.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.07% | -20.74% | -74.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.20% | -12.98% | -73.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.00% | 13.84% | +37.16% |
Volatility
GRPN vs. IR - Volatility Comparison
Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) has a higher volatility of 24.78% compared to Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) at 10.46%. This indicates that GRPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRPN | IR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.78% | 10.46% | +14.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.38% | 25.99% | +36.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.33% | 34.83% | +42.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.29% | 30.29% | +60.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.46% | 34.37% | +48.09% |
Dividends
GRPN vs. IR - Dividend Comparison
GRPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPN Groupon, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 5.78% |
Financials
GRPN vs. IR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Groupon, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRPN vs. IR - Profitability Comparison
GRPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Groupon, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.05M and revenue of 117.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.5%.
IR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a gross profit of 862.60M and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.
GRPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Groupon, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.32M and revenue of 117.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
IR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported an operating income of 380.30M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
GRPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Groupon, Inc. reported a net income of -12.86M and revenue of 117.20M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.
IR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a net income of 256.80M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRPN and IR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRPN has higher volatility (24.78%) compared to IR (10.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPN dropped -99.47% vs IR's -50.27%.
IR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRPN and IR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer