PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPN vs. APO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRPN vs. APO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) and Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPN achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly higher than APO's -9.02% return. Over the past 10 years, GRPN has underperformed APO with an annualized return of -12.37%, while APO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.24% annualized return.


GRPN

1D
-0.83%
1M
-11.46%
YTD
-4.83%
6M
-7.66%
1Y
-54.62%
3Y*
45.07%
5Y*
-18.41%
10Y*
-12.37%

APO

1D
-3.40%
1M
1.63%
YTD
-9.02%
6M
-11.24%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
23.33%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*
29.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPN vs. APO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRPN
Groupon, Inc.
-4.83%44.94%-5.37%49.65%-62.95%-39.04%-20.51%-25.31%-37.25%53.61%
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
-9.02%-11.12%79.87%49.44%-9.59%53.25%8.00%106.46%-22.03%85.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPN and APO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2011

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRPN:

$679.33M

APO:

$77.71B

EPS

GRPN:

-$2.41

APO:

$3.58

PS Ratio

GRPN:

1.45

APO:

2.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRPN:

$498.44M

APO:

$29.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRPN:

$443.22M

APO:

$26.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRPN:

$9.20M

APO:

$9.28B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPN vs. APO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPN
GRPN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GRPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPN Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPN Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

APO
APO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
APO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
APO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
APO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
APO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPN vs. APO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) and Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRPNAPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.03

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.03

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-0.06

-1.02

GRPN vs. APO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the APO Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPN and APO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRPN vs. APO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPN drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than APO's maximum drawdown of -56.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPN and APO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPNAPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.47%

-56.99%

-42.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.20%

-34.97%

-39.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.20%

-42.82%

-31.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.52%

-42.82%

-50.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.48%

-53.48%

-44.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.01%

-25.23%

-71.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.13%

-16.40%

-69.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.69%

16.79%

+33.90%

Volatility

GRPN vs. APO - Volatility Comparison

Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) has a higher volatility of 23.21% compared to Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) at 8.94%. This indicates that GRPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPNAPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.21%

8.94%

+14.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.14%

27.21%

+25.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.32%

35.39%

+33.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.04%

37.18%

+51.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.33%

37.84%

+44.49%

Dividends

GRPN vs. APO - Dividend Comparison

GRPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
1.60%1.38%1.10%1.81%2.51%2.90%4.72%4.23%7.86%5.53%6.46%12.91%
GRPN
Groupon, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GRPN vs. APO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Groupon, Inc. and Apollo Global Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
117.20M
4.93B
(GRPN) Total Revenue
(APO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GRPN vs. APO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Groupon, Inc. and Apollo Global Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
90.5%
100.0%
Portfolio components
GRPN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Groupon, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.05M and revenue of 117.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.5%.

APO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

GRPN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Groupon, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.32M and revenue of 117.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

APO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

GRPN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Groupon, Inc. reported a net income of -12.86M and revenue of 117.20M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.

APO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRPN and APO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRPN has higher volatility (23.21%) compared to APO (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPN dropped -99.47% vs APO's -56.99%.

APO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPN and APO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer