PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPN vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRPN vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPN achieves a 56.62% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GRPN has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -12.26%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


GRPN

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.82%
6M
94.91%
YTD
56.62%
1Y
-5.09%
3Y*
53.07%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
-12.26%
ALL TIME*
-18.48%

^GSPC

1D
0.70%
1M
0.09%
6M
7.94%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.98T$37.61T$41.48T
$35.71M$38.89M$37.92M

GRPN vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRPN
Groupon, Inc.
56.62%44.94%-5.37%49.65%-62.95%-39.04%-20.51%-25.31%-37.25%53.61%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.41%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPN and ^GSPC is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2011

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPN vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GRPN
GRPN Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GRPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPN Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPN Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GRPN vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRPN^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.25

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.00

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.21

8.49

-8.70

GRPN vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPN and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRPN vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPN drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPN and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPN^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.47%

-56.78%

-42.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.87%

-9.10%

-64.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.20%

-18.90%

-55.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.71%

-25.43%

-66.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.48%

-33.92%

-63.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.07%

-1.58%

-93.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.20%

-10.70%

-75.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.00%

2.14%

+48.86%

Volatility

GRPN vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Groupon, Inc. (GRPN) has a higher volatility of 24.78% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that GRPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPN^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.78%

3.51%

+21.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.38%

10.11%

+52.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.33%

12.87%

+64.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.29%

17.01%

+73.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.46%

18.07%

+64.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRPN and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRPN has higher volatility (24.78%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPN dropped -99.47% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPN and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer