PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRND vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRND vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grindr Inc (GRND) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRND achieves a -2.95% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 228.76% return.


GRND

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
-39.97%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*

MRVL

1D
-9.36%
1M
42.13%
YTD
228.76%
6M
218.64%
1Y
295.30%
3Y*
69.56%
5Y*
38.34%
10Y*
40.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRND vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GRND
Grindr Inc
-2.95%-24.10%103.19%88.82%-54.11%-7.89%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
228.76%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%74.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GRND and MRVL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRND:

$2.43B

MRVL:

$249.27B

EPS

GRND:

$0.50

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

GRND:

26.50

MRVL:

96.35

PEG Ratio

GRND:

0.01

MRVL:

0.18

PS Ratio

GRND:

5.26

MRVL:

27.93

PB Ratio

GRND:

2.90K

MRVL:

13.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRND:

$475.90M

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRND:

$354.24M

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRND:

$136.49M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRND vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRND
GRND Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRND Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRND Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRND vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grindr Inc (GRND) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRNDMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.53

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

11.28

-11.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

25.64

-26.65

GRND vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRND Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRND and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRND vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRND drawdown since its inception was -87.26%, roughly equal to the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRND and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNDMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.26%

-91.60%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.61%

-26.36%

-30.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.17%

-60.79%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.26%

-61.88%

-25.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.00%

-11.82%

-52.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-46.70%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.53%

11.58%

+27.95%

Volatility

GRND vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grindr Inc (GRND) is 16.11%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 44.32%. This indicates that GRND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNDMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

44.32%

-28.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.06%

57.96%

-28.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.72%

72.86%

-23.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

108.70%

62.42%

+46.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.26%

52.25%

+52.01%

Dividends

GRND vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

GRND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRND
Grindr Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

GRND vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grindr Inc and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
129.94M
2.42B
(GRND) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GRND vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grindr Inc and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
52.2%
Portfolio components
GRND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grindr Inc reported a gross profit of 97.35M and revenue of 129.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

GRND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grindr Inc reported an operating income of 42.73M and revenue of 129.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

GRND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grindr Inc reported a net income of 26.75M and revenue of 129.94M, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRND and MRVL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (44.32%) compared to GRND (16.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRND dropped -87.26% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRND and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer