PortfoliosLab logo
GRMN vs. BUD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GRMN and BUD is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GRMN vs. BUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GRMN:

0.65

BUD:

0.66

Sortino Ratio

GRMN:

1.33

BUD:

1.16

Omega Ratio

GRMN:

1.21

BUD:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

GRMN:

0.98

BUD:

0.27

Martin Ratio

GRMN:

2.94

BUD:

1.26

Ulcer Index

GRMN:

9.38%

BUD:

12.90%

Daily Std Dev

GRMN:

40.39%

BUD:

22.67%

Max Drawdown

GRMN:

-87.71%

BUD:

-71.10%

Current Drawdown

GRMN:

-15.81%

BUD:

-37.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRMN:

$39.08B

BUD:

$136.89B

EPS

GRMN:

$7.59

BUD:

$3.40

PE Ratio

GRMN:

26.74

BUD:

20.96

PEG Ratio

GRMN:

2.72

BUD:

1.63

PS Ratio

GRMN:

6.06

BUD:

2.33

PB Ratio

GRMN:

4.78

BUD:

1.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRMN:

$6.45B

BUD:

$58.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRMN:

$3.78B

BUD:

$40.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRMN:

$1.81B

BUD:

$22.18B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than BUD's 44.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed BUD with an annualized return of 19.68%, while BUD has yielded a comparatively lower -3.64% annualized return.


GRMN

YTD

-1.25%

1M

5.82%

6M

-4.25%

1Y

25.85%

3Y*

27.66%

5Y*

18.90%

10Y*

19.68%

BUD

YTD

44.63%

1M

7.97%

6M

33.76%

1Y

14.82%

3Y*

10.27%

5Y*

7.04%

10Y*

-3.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Garmin Ltd.

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRMN vs. BUD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GRMN is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GRMN is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GRMN is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GRMN is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GRMN is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GRMN is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BUD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BUD is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BUD is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BUD is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BUD is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BUD is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BUD is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GRMN vs. BUD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GRMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the BUD Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRMN and BUD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GRMN vs. BUD - Dividend Comparison

GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than BUD's 1.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
1.48%1.44%2.27%3.10%1.92%2.01%2.30%3.32%3.42%4.21%5.41%3.58%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
1.58%1.76%1.28%0.67%0.98%0.81%2.45%3.84%2.88%3.03%2.58%2.38%

Drawdowns

GRMN vs. BUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, which is greater than BUD's maximum drawdown of -71.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and BUD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GRMN vs. BUD - Volatility Comparison

Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) at 5.39%. This indicates that GRMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GRMN vs. BUD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20212022202320242025
1.54B
13.63B
(GRMN) Total Revenue
(BUD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GRMN vs. BUD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Garmin Ltd. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

54.0%55.0%56.0%57.0%58.0%59.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
57.6%
55.6%
(GRMN) Gross Margin
(BUD) Gross Margin
GRMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 884.55M and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

BUD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 7.58B and revenue of 13.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

GRMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 332.82M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.

BUD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 3.59B and revenue of 13.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

GRMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 332.77M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.

BUD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 2.15B and revenue of 13.63B, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.