GRMN vs. BUD
Compare and contrast key facts about Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GRMN or BUD.
Key characteristics
GRMN | BUD | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 68.46% | -12.05% |
1Y Return | 86.98% | -4.81% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 17.28% | -0.91% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 20.09% | -5.49% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 18.04% | -4.85% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.58 | -0.23 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.82 | -0.18 |
Omega Ratio | 1.72 | 0.98 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.83 | -0.09 |
Martin Ratio | 20.54 | -0.62 |
Ulcer Index | 4.22% | 7.55% |
Daily Std Dev | 33.62% | 20.23% |
Max Drawdown | -87.71% | -71.10% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -51.48% |
Fundamentals
GRMN | BUD | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $41.01B | $113.33B |
EPS | $7.86 | $3.20 |
PE Ratio | 27.17 | 17.50 |
PEG Ratio | 3.11 | 0.79 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $5.96B | $74.02B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.48B | $40.62B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $1.58B | $16.89B |
Correlation
The correlation between GRMN and BUD is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GRMN vs. BUD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GRMN achieves a 68.46% return, which is significantly higher than BUD's -12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, GRMN has outperformed BUD with an annualized return of 18.04%, while BUD has yielded a comparatively lower -4.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GRMN vs. BUD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GRMN vs. BUD - Dividend Comparison
GRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than BUD's 1.57% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Garmin Ltd. | 1.39% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% | 3.58% | 3.90% |
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 1.57% | 1.28% | 0.67% | 0.98% | 0.81% | 2.45% | 3.84% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.58% | 2.38% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
GRMN vs. BUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRMN drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, which is greater than BUD's maximum drawdown of -71.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRMN and BUD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GRMN vs. BUD - Volatility Comparison
Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) has a higher volatility of 21.64% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) at 6.88%. This indicates that GRMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GRMN vs. BUD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garmin Ltd. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities