PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. LCTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. LCTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 28.91% return, which is significantly higher than LCTD's 6.33% return.


GRID

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.85%
YTD
28.91%
6M
29.60%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.76%

LCTD

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.33%
6M
8.97%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. LCTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
28.91%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%18.10%
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
6.33%30.42%3.14%17.10%-16.16%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and LCTD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021

0.83

The correlation between GRID and LCTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

GRID vs. LCTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
LCTD

Industrials

65.2%
19.5%

Utilities

20.4%
4.0%

Technology

11.0%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
8.4%

Basic Materials

0.0%
5.8%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.0%

Energy

-

5.8%

Financial Services

-

26.7%

Healthcare

-

9.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Industrials

GRID
65.2%
LCTD
19.5%

Utilities

GRID
20.4%
LCTD
4.0%

Technology

GRID
11.0%
LCTD
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
3.5%
LCTD
8.4%

Basic Materials

GRID
0.0%
LCTD
5.8%

Communication Services

GRID

-

LCTD
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

LCTD
6.0%

Energy

GRID

-

LCTD
5.8%

Financial Services

GRID

-

LCTD
26.7%

Healthcare

GRID

-

LCTD
9.3%

Real Estate

GRID

-

LCTD
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. LCTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LCTD
LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. LCTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRIDLCTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

1.77

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.72

6.39

+10.33

GRID vs. LCTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the LCTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and LCTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRIDLCTDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.33

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.42

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Drawdowns

GRID vs. LCTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than LCTD's maximum drawdown of -29.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and LCTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDLCTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-29.82%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-10.92%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-13.59%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-29.82%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-3.23%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-6.79%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.03%

+0.06%

Volatility

GRID vs. LCTD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) at 4.31%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDLCTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

4.31%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.08%

11.99%

+4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

14.55%

+4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.00%

16.14%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

16.06%

+6.75%

GRID vs. LCTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTD's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. LCTD - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than LCTD's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.40%3.61%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and LCTD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to LCTD (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs LCTD's -29.82%.

On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 17.84% vs 6.77% for LCTD. On fees, LCTD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LCTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LCTD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

LCTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.20% for LCTD.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and LCTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer