PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRES vs. MLPA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GRES and MLPA is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

GRES vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Global Resources ETF (GRES) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
44.91%
43.42%
GRES
MLPA

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


GRES

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MLPA

YTD

16.98%

1M

-2.83%

6M

6.19%

1Y

16.15%

5Y*

9.87%

10Y*

1.57%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRES vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRES has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPA's 0.46% expense ratio.


MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
Expense ratio chart for MLPA: current value at 0.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.46%
Expense ratio chart for GRES: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRES vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Resources ETF (GRES) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRES, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.001.86
GRES
MLPA


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.00
1.32
GRES
MLPA

Dividends

GRES vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

GRES has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GRES
IQ Global Resources ETF
0.00%4.64%1.03%0.00%9.90%1.73%0.77%0.00%0.38%0.16%1.30%1.09%
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
7.45%7.49%7.30%8.72%13.85%9.11%10.03%8.07%7.16%9.29%5.80%5.62%

Drawdowns

GRES vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-6.43%
-8.71%
GRES
MLPA

Volatility

GRES vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Global Resources ETF (GRES) is 0.00%, while Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that GRES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember0
4.97%
GRES
MLPA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab