PortfoliosLab logo
GRAB vs. CELH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GRAB and CELH is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

GRAB vs. CELH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-59.80%
217.18%
GRAB
CELH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GRAB:

0.74

CELH:

-0.73

Sortino Ratio

GRAB:

1.30

CELH:

-1.02

Omega Ratio

GRAB:

1.20

CELH:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

GRAB:

0.44

CELH:

-0.63

Martin Ratio

GRAB:

2.76

CELH:

-0.81

Ulcer Index

GRAB:

13.12%

CELH:

60.26%

Daily Std Dev

GRAB:

49.24%

CELH:

67.38%

Max Drawdown

GRAB:

-86.46%

CELH:

-99.79%

Current Drawdown

GRAB:

-71.98%

CELH:

-61.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRAB:

$19.07B

CELH:

$9.59B

EPS

GRAB:

-$0.03

CELH:

$0.45

PS Ratio

GRAB:

6.82

CELH:

7.07

PB Ratio

GRAB:

3.04

CELH:

23.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRAB:

$2.14B

CELH:

$999.92M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRAB:

$915.00M

CELH:

$498.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

GRAB:

$117.00M

CELH:

$78.58M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAB achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than CELH's 39.48% return.


GRAB

YTD

1.27%

1M

4.60%

6M

17.44%

1Y

36.57%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CELH

YTD

39.48%

1M

9.18%

6M

16.05%

1Y

-49.78%

5Y*

87.47%

10Y*

46.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRAB vs. CELH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GRAB is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CELH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CELH is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CELH is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CELH is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CELH is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CELH is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CELH is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GRAB vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRAB, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
GRAB: 0.74
CELH: -0.73
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRAB, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
GRAB: 1.30
CELH: -1.02
The chart of Omega ratio for GRAB, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
GRAB: 1.20
CELH: 0.89
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRAB, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
GRAB: 0.44
CELH: -0.63
The chart of Martin ratio for GRAB, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
GRAB: 2.76
CELH: -0.81

The current GRAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the CELH Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRAB and CELH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.74
-0.73
GRAB
CELH

Dividends

GRAB vs. CELH - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAB nor CELH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GRAB vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAB drawdown since its inception was -86.46%, smaller than the maximum CELH drawdown of -99.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAB and CELH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-71.98%
-61.77%
GRAB
CELH

Volatility

GRAB vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison

Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) has a higher volatility of 26.70% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) at 15.30%. This indicates that GRAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
26.70%
15.30%
GRAB
CELH

Financials

GRAB vs. CELH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grab Holdings Limited and Celsius Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items